From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sepehr.nazary@googlemail.com>
Received: from mail-yw0-f170.google.com (mail-yw0-f170.google.com
 [209.85.161.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C837529D6
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon,  4 Jul 2016 12:03:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-yw0-f170.google.com with SMTP id l125so36176497ywb.2
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 03:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=jWkFyFxJt5aXK3cz1QRCDHvAvrcLQWF4HC6/R6xvVNY=;
 b=xOeG9ONkDm5OqXRKzWc6IoIWXhEDQ1MCHFq1vzJop7xPZcScQ315ypr3htoxjMGw9n
 sZIfNov3hAEDz7uB7ShouhAzJDSy1CPEif+QxweNDk5Yqb9GQiryBoq3JMzA0ykBhtyz
 slnXq9aQ1ODubR9i3STA1tWxwvLW0XbjAts+NBpk+3SOClKQUrfEyheXUJY42pyYF8ro
 hgzxVaPfud8pBVBIK5e9SVyHvCDuGFUAACPq6MeA9XoiKkXnLy6+2QuSrZo0T7jNEvmM
 Rndm8nZ/UBv9Ot4WxTmVN9PHZKVKJPpbneq6tS4FHFHH+0VE0f3YwCRROD5ybiHBGnae
 bzSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=jWkFyFxJt5aXK3cz1QRCDHvAvrcLQWF4HC6/R6xvVNY=;
 b=K/3IzTbHhlKWATdyXIknSAZZs5bWYApuwHzjFTWOLG8i64pGjaXxifOnS4Y/zGH+8N
 QznCDqmZNsRWv2QMXOdtSov6SPAe9XVo0ztnyxqCxp1vBlQN1Yq7skc0u0IUhtjy6kb9
 NjxEg7zgkvAmxHlaMwGrOMSMwQGwYyza7ONyoTbHXmjQgj+mwjC56kTnBuSqwAVewxxT
 +CnkvwKmEx6SfRCWiVnh/aD3Jd7GOP8TpzX8l4Cp9OUsVwfB0Dw/Ta5AIDXXCONklf1N
 Z+DzLt0sR6rKJVWLyEe88JHaLXaiGqPYnwYvMeH5dA91oqdpgLt+9eIge+ODDQy2sOIn
 5lmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIwBM5x8DST4mjgifIwWemWhiuVp7jeSfTFpVp+l6HP2clrodVQBqK9Q07tcFjWO5uMmXOYSCP704AQGw==
X-Received: by 10.13.193.6 with SMTP id c6mr5691824ywd.98.1467626626174; Mon,
 04 Jul 2016 03:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.248.197 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 03:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sepehr Nazary <sepehr.nazary@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 14:33:45 +0430
Message-ID: <CAHtRHyDPhVtW1q9D7N=LgNCV2w26uaK0cv8tD+k1uVZQ=vvSkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] multi core performance problem
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 10:03:47 -0000

Hi
I run dpdk multi_process (symetric_mp) example and see this result:

NumberOfCore  Throughput
1              9986
2              9987
3              9808
4              9988
5              9645
6              9171
7              9030
8              8517
9              8537
10              8415
11              7832
12              7985
13              7569
14              7285
15              7624
16              6994

I run pktgen with range on and packet size is 64 byte.
I sure RSS works correctly and packets are distributed uniformly between
cores. Packet drops is 0, as well.

Why performance decrease ??

configuration :
dpdk-2.2.0, pktgen 3.0.0
NIC model : 82599ES 10-Gigabit
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
Linux version 3.16.0-4-amd64
Two NUMA Node:
socket 0 : 16G RAM , 18 CORE , 2 NIC ,run DPDK symetric_mp example
socket 1 : 16G RAM , 18 CORE , 2 NIC ,run Pktgen (range on)