From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ranshalit@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com (mail-io0-f182.google.com
 [209.85.223.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CCA91BF
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue,  9 Feb 2016 09:48:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-io0-f182.google.com with SMTP id d63so10998357ioj.2
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:48:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=FK3z29W3qXdraOvPqkMA3UBqgad790oAYG5Fo5FxKr4=;
 b=Nmjf1rOPUa/5vmOn2jhX1ne57b3UrV8iwb6HYEg48TVHfGvrOCfuaNWXt1KH2mupdT
 IhYhrH2mdJB+FMM5Dx2oPfK6MwRlR1bKWHdxIAPU5DDg+xHJ02m+K6jMRYOXGN7F0bu6
 w6HOzO650Z94AuwSTJ+vvYrAbYNIuaQRBdXEGVJa9qA80hlSXhObDvFCqnSutUOYbWID
 hMcwcdImaMg7wB8Oaz15HAsh0hDDZlx3HjeYNOL+VgcGgl46Ur4YGVARbybg0uvzVxnv
 4jHVFkOkEmapgaTRNbJP/k2ZDl83HXYFvS4ZuHF5J9WBXg3wVm4IhFOvlNINhbOfsKzz
 K1dQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=FK3z29W3qXdraOvPqkMA3UBqgad790oAYG5Fo5FxKr4=;
 b=ffUeK0teG4iJwtisPz4rt53w/saNIX8qDHeiw0wcdHXDpbyktNKDBWeJmHoumByZZR
 5qMbZvvwiLjUEpJhCuDr+tyy3BnElTs0j8+WI2YmoXLZXAsYtl/Tzc4PRy14tq8wCpVg
 6sMEH4zWUerWZuiqKfkS+vKyBrr2ybCVdMlDfiYchWpkQlYAjaNxtTt1nc3AXYrRhel7
 TNBjQAR97uhh9o1maCfamqG4Sa/HtvSNKu2eJVJA72dwVSoAkPseWs0Zd7XhDm4qiEua
 O7uQRF92wQV2SM8OivIPZwnp0fiQ3UrpnSZAOn73v+QOZYHQkfiVwx2ONJEyiKdoSQPE
 wGOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTU362mORwSVI5AZPkgNlSJVuoDXLMrgLOpb9MJax29f7DjYakr3+Qgo+tEv6eof9BadOhPgljB4orFDg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.154.79 with SMTP id c76mr30238032ioe.53.1455007679213;
 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:47:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.49.14 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 00:47:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ2oMhLE2frG+H2q3O7OFivLSTGZ+MSem8ExpSKTzXxTu8QrBA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJ2oMhLE2frG+H2q3O7OFivLSTGZ+MSem8ExpSKTzXxTu8QrBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:47:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJ2oMh+k4cqqatOJjXabuYacpM5nJ4uAw6JqoouVhs4PFTdwDQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ran Shalit <ranshalit@gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Support for cavium Octeon ?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 08:48:00 -0000

 Does dpdk support Cavium Octeon with PCI express ?
I see there is Nitrox library, where can I read more about it ?


On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Ran Shalit <ranshalit@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does dpdk support Cavium Octeon 73xx ?
> We need to develop application over PCIe between intel cpu and Cavium Octeon.
> I wander if it should work with Cavium Octeon or only with Intel's cpu ?
>
> Best Regards,
> Ran