From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7C343024 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:05:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD68640DD8; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:05:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D796406B6 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:05:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1691651114; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oIb9k1me8BPaoyma+s5dqd+dUdcyQ8qOJwxEZNrVxFs=; b=HfWAvdNoP51ugyF+O7sgGRKgrYfLOCBV7SKPeXdGv/3UDBpJeyTTuSU0xVFJ9T27I8N35K fBwcUfVtIvvLYi7ekI/rPGPThcqu+Vp77le7vQ8AE1ap4QFjYvlHiS1WcnH+xtOzr9JdIp 23B33+MGqmnR4YMdJAi/wd7fbsEUklg= Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-226-ITgfb4pHNRqQjkwkuIP_Uw-1; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 03:05:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ITgfb4pHNRqQjkwkuIP_Uw-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4fe65cd1b3cso490148e87.2 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:05:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691651111; x=1692255911; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oIb9k1me8BPaoyma+s5dqd+dUdcyQ8qOJwxEZNrVxFs=; b=Tlmjq8toIQhT9goumyHBG2nCamFqaRl//ebF7/obznWYnafTc/gNhAO5B/6+d0kiGU Yi7pPFlKTVUmrRchb+2A0yt3NwM1X98SQZ+7Pr0T9YzjD1TMW9IQ66jmWboLrty0MpDk /JBOhdBXaDNw7xlAfRm+qdGMJT/9a27KFNXRNHTYpVzsnKSwyFzIxpDZrNGmqHB33tmy U68y9AxqwbqcJH1eWUil4boUtmEFHn0ifv2IkB1SZm+FqNFqDk+gsOCEIUv/qwxZzCSY zP4WV+x4SAXfXORg/OoN+WA3bbd+PO/pktNM9Nf+Sc6BNNitpvkC9UgZTYtXjK16NO8e 5P4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwZZCdF8CY546mQhR3zmhz8M7OFbnf6+Cxv7JmzIq2KNX0FT+zX 7o9M6G8ZnEfuziwogLl8QdoOmnSAniTCawWBw+T82ffzW/4Fx7maVfxtBH24AJniE1T92SCct82 JtRKHlAtK0MgoBd2uN4HnXg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:110a:b0:4fe:55ba:d541 with SMTP id l10-20020a056512110a00b004fe55bad541mr1133855lfg.50.1691651111215; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:05:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFGjgFz2CWM3Q0BzXKpkCQHX3KSp2PStb3qsAu2Bt+B73co/J1gQWl3RG6DVdbOUnHycz+CzdX8Mwtx42mdQJU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:110a:b0:4fe:55ba:d541 with SMTP id l10-20020a056512110a00b004fe55bad541mr1133836lfg.50.1691651110603; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:05:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:04:58 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dynamic Fields Zeroing To: Oleksandr Nahnybida , Olivier Matz Cc: users@dpdk.org X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 3:24=E2=80=AFPM Oleksandr Nahnybida wrote: > > Should I expect that mbuf that I get from rx_burst, won't have dynfield z= eroed, and I should do this myself? I think setting/clearing a dynfield is the responsibility of the component that registered it. Olivier, can you enlighten us? --=20 David Marchand