From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99ACA0A03 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:42:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8BA140D9A; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:42:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9BE140D97 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:42:14 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610959334; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=opT8alTOmtF3iTymW14o5X1vPRc1aTDwjDy4o8c42rs=; b=EdEBaxChnFQstGzqqExsxh/zYym3b8KLv+jjO1BfpSJGSfTKjvwUAgfq1b3/bGZCZaRufV 0VqgOc/XXTS8nxrS1bK7XOYnoQKgz74F7vvi2w3X5Mw7sf0UiW/FooEL1XXHXyO45XhigR tu+TedLWpDEbcErpo4PPZkhqp6fTrOw= Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com [209.85.222.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-161-AiytaxI7MMmg97cURyWL6g-1; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 03:42:10 -0500 X-MC-Unique: AiytaxI7MMmg97cURyWL6g-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id o16so2056912uaj.10 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:42:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=opT8alTOmtF3iTymW14o5X1vPRc1aTDwjDy4o8c42rs=; b=MttjkOKfve+hqY6orM2mUJpygUBNuD184sr6IJrNRrTr5ewG++kLdA7npR7wyOfsgt b21O8xfkmmJfldZYeRcEwRnc5+7d3Y4SmJMq7jSuwggDocdynYamVzshy1uEj6uhB3SL zvFLqlnTEqHt3xpPq5yzyUHT6W/nEG5zAaIt7Aofo6Dxai2GFrncF+V4k/cSVk6vD3TR pkJzrYV18l/4hJg88BB23WfwVDmbpXMVFMNsh3yv8bkS9b2QreSc1xqb/3VycwlkXcty CAIq1QyX5Vt55lkSl0DFTSLcD7RXyD2jMFeijVejbUU6zzeun5g+IvAdc9VQVI0atu0j u4Yw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530DirFAq79YwW9h5BR89t6Oy7A6c0HMktzNeTzY9CX8BU0livVL IxyoN0m/NXmuBlSfGGwan52N/VsfNTLAx3EoOUIlwqZJ0do/vFpIkMbqOtttQOxvokyQgN9Lym+ UIqzIL5Z0SS13sUDkgHs3vw== X-Received: by 2002:ab0:4588:: with SMTP id u8mr3399068uau.41.1610959330286; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:42:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy57ViQXbjsVqjOlBwJs6DkSp82Ib2+yY3KP2LKODcX5exGT3S44Zt6i+LIXh9iJ8i/t1pCw8EWyYu98z4t1NM= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:4588:: with SMTP id u8mr3399063uau.41.1610959330140; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:42:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:41:59 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Li, Jiu (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)" , Robert Sanford , Erik Gabriel Carrillo Cc: "users@dpdk.org" , "Dong, Shaojie (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)" , "Ye, Hua (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)" , "Alasaarela, Risto (Nokia - FI/Oulu)" , "Jarvelaid, Rain (Nokia - FI/Oulu)" , "Wu, Jianyue (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)" , "Pan, Jianyong (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Integration from Dpdk18.05 to Dpdk19.11 - rte_timer_subsystem_init(void) X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 11:04 PM Li, Jiu (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) wrote: > > Hello! Dpdk experts, > > On Dpdk 18.05, void rte_timer_subsystem_init(void) > On Dpdk 19.11, int rte_timer_subsystem_init(void) implementation changed, which will return 0, -EALREADY or -ENOMEM; > > There is still have dpdk "process" mode (instead of pdkd thread mode) deployment in my side. > Can I have a question? > > If rte_timer_subsystem_init() is called one time is enough? > After rte_timer_subsystem_init() called with return 0 by one process , then other processes are able to use "rte timer" service without issue, right? > Copied timer library maintainers. -- David Marchand