From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1346B45C7B for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:51:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC19A427B3; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:51:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5C14027E for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:51:02 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1730836261; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=C/5Y5b/XwqxKtOoE9SThDHzV3RTgB5qpeT57AgoI928=; b=dufKfO5Zr0dxRH5TwyiCIsu9MNXEiqwUu6m77bhiaswlsID5AdAFKNU+0P2X/jk9oA4q9C 4o8dByTnFESfkLI7u3dgl4kEs3K3vOsCr/gdMQQ4yvbcPSkvq28u4/QfAhMkmaFrZrHHTp nQE7yZHbSB0HVmMnHbtrXxVHvaM1+wY= Received: from mail-lj1-f199.google.com (mail-lj1-f199.google.com [209.85.208.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-346-ux8nRcX3PtqckzkjHNDUYg-1; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:51:00 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ux8nRcX3PtqckzkjHNDUYg-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2fb44181f04so33446201fa.2 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 11:50:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730836258; x=1731441058; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=C/5Y5b/XwqxKtOoE9SThDHzV3RTgB5qpeT57AgoI928=; b=ORKhB9EQJxM22VEj6DdNybMptaSzlLoJiZiDBdKqvfkqt032VFlDiuTWmAcMjzQCDc XiXgxeBEHjk4LOoidRXN1atMCOxfyU5kpVNuSJ26i0FYNIkx13gVZW8Mb2zNE6L99GkP dIYk8EE8L3gU9cHESKutDfn8IOGlvV4u4MHYLJYtso5fvQki+d6HJImnIhaKaPkq0ZZ7 yRxkIThv58K88TQPHi+APKjKu77b/mWQWiucdx8qLBu6eZ/EqsfbSb0xs/V073QRxqd0 QhmSmFwfW9b01kR3sUM4NYeaBtdqxLee7EriKhRL7w6hz7k1aOJ9zVMg4QUNg1QB3biZ Jayw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxin3uFra4Fop4j1fykrxBUj57DewswsApfQqheh2gcreteytjU jj91TBytug3KA9PheryVjCiF3kqWoMkKQHaVXw5s+/jc6/0MbpJcJbsiMX3z2fdj9qHo0v7cR56 nH04h9K/4pAcmUqV2zPyI+yO69ap0MMOhbyPMRynEXqF3I3t4JsSMkMU+1fxXcFlHx7gkxiDJX7 PcpWyM5it9hWDHoyDMvQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:110f:b0:539:e6fc:4170 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53c79e4c3d2mr10005952e87.32.1730836258618; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 11:50:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGs2Gr9UCzb16EV9u9RGpfzK2jtAPK+yumGpZnPrEubY/V8zgqSwu99b2zh0PvYDw9K6g9NZO0pkuvyyRjuZRM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:110f:b0:539:e6fc:4170 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53c79e4c3d2mr10005939e87.32.1730836258192; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 11:50:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:50:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Arm Neoverse-V2 support? To: David Aldrich Cc: users , Honnappa Nagarahalli X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Hello, On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 7:08=E2=80=AFPM David Aldrich wrote: > > Hi, we want to run DPDK on a NVIDIA Grace cpu. I tried building DPDK > v.23.11.1 with gcc 14.2 but got: > > Message: Arm implementer: Arm > Message: Arm part number: 0xd4f > > config/arm/meson.build:687:8: ERROR: Problem encountered: Unsupported > part number 0xd4f of implementer 0x41. Please add support for it or > use the generic (-Dplatform=3Dgeneric) build. > > I think part number 0xd4f is ARM Neoverse-V2. > > I have seen some dpdk patch emails about support for Neoverse-V2 but I > don't know how to interpret them. Can anyone please tell me the dpdk > support status for this cpu, or tell me what we can do to workaround > this? IIUC, this was added in v24.03 in commit d007038c0121 ("config/arm: add NVIDIA Grace CPU"). Cc: Honnappa. --=20 David Marchand