From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F7E45C25 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 19:08:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FE94027E; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 19:08:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-yb1-f173.google.com (mail-yb1-f173.google.com [209.85.219.173]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35CB40156 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 19:08:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-yb1-f173.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e29267b4dc4so4756480276.0 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:08:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1730830124; x=1731434924; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7RabeQJ0/OP7tQ1X7OYobAMMyLmXCHGmnZXDKOcHkdI=; b=MDQDhg0O2CfZdIUO/PRZzYb/G9j9yPAvdtFOw9Ns1cmnwSMT+EsQBnlpYmhbK23dr9 VZhhPTu8NROPpzSI10Cd2jLeFQySNQwOo2hPSA3BRh5eq+GXrS2LF9wMwd8Ci+WBrBvU ITsp9JO38hnLTzQoJy9IWr2wWuCPl2AfYF12ksPtroHK1CpnCD8bwrLIj7IPczbw/h2P m4oy9+Z0V95LB20xpsyGV2TyIGHodyZ/ykDt3l1ycDk0H1IcWy96JRQjX5juB5rw2q/6 D+Br3QulknxnIMrygTKDmxee4zUPdaIYIeSNy0k2KQZzbH2gk6GkuezBqq53OIQlgAB6 Bjew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730830124; x=1731434924; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7RabeQJ0/OP7tQ1X7OYobAMMyLmXCHGmnZXDKOcHkdI=; b=mgEegL1YK7yzs8GxH7NIivuAzUeC7RF+f+hs30K12IUOAvXQx8GP4mPtvi+hxc+0iX FUmz0znHMntZrPUFmybLaGmgVEdpSX3HO+lyo7XGHb9rDnF0MJ09iPKSnWxWhPXJr+Tb 2m5fpFCOZiYdR2cmzekxtW5xW4nuyEa2B0TRWE9W00m8vG9Ikh8JC2toLWlEQzAHTUwD KAgPc0vwzb084ZC/IpOJyphPYqrJkIyab9ITOiQdDt57wfI5EWKkYizyCc1C8v7C47sb W21hh7r7po6opmL0MoUxkQVVMKx8dW68AI1gaoPozkXXx7LE++uChi2blOAtdhzmMzMs Z/wQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxyH9X5de24weL4HSCgJ8297306yCLWV6qcnYFCFxVqEHviRULh X8GhfKoF+dXxRBN4lYdI+jnidX7IWJBMjoazFCZf5+3c45btBw5zIMr3mcXK8Kkz6owEUm3qDTi 9HY6BBMZQPMsLxJnvs4Mgp/NNeJ3YoHSy X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFDd71Y/vnWSVVNCqST51WoA9E4cNmE2b7NoTxu3vVJ947204YiG95jzZxK9x69z3+PRorxdUIkfJE7ohEkk8k= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:1008:b0:e30:c8db:34cd with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e330254e9f6mr14537128276.3.1730830124067; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:08:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: David Aldrich Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 18:08:33 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Arm Neoverse-V2 support? To: users Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, we want to run DPDK on a NVIDIA Grace cpu. I tried building DPDK v.23.11.1 with gcc 14.2 but got: Message: Arm implementer: Arm Message: Arm part number: 0xd4f config/arm/meson.build:687:8: ERROR: Problem encountered: Unsupported part number 0xd4f of implementer 0x41. Please add support for it or use the generic (-Dplatform=generic) build. I think part number 0xd4f is ARM Neoverse-V2. I have seen some dpdk patch emails about support for Neoverse-V2 but I don't know how to interpret them. Can anyone please tell me the dpdk support status for this cpu, or tell me what we can do to workaround this? Best regards David