From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BD7A0527 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:18:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A881BE9A; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:18:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oo1-f45.google.com (mail-oo1-f45.google.com [209.85.161.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F75211A2 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:18:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oo1-f45.google.com with SMTP id p26so973783oos.7 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 02:18:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KKjbQrW5oCCV4VEqoJukTbl/ZS1u8QAVvNtOdM7/s/I=; b=cpGY96psM009kLL7Np5YdOw6+rv4tLz8CRDrAmy00GsbGIjzV/wkNPSG+udsboED6s 8E8hbc/uZOHs4c4TnoqLxc7RwXf2H3Ql2eh8+NbmbJbjnOJxIVhpM8z1ZeLI1Tu/3SHd NqvFZk6iXn5HWCuykycwej0oMZ4bP23nQjq3tvZBtzGHt6Uw5JdSGsKTpCU4AGIi6tZs PUkQ4FHyHMqh9uwIH2cRfOcqy9txfpBbk3nGcmMZulXaOlUK4AuwMs08sGkcGvef10Ph 5vEI7GVaPBZaWKJeKh7WiJnUCVt9vdnlKhmLMeNOq0SsgO63jg6/ex8rJiqyTYPOx5Ov 2y/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KKjbQrW5oCCV4VEqoJukTbl/ZS1u8QAVvNtOdM7/s/I=; b=L0YkstXAQCU9Hs5AkLGudmaqG2SGyCRDbYGBJx2Nn5htsLF8vnPQ6WBqxQoTblZqT5 PZoan/THCfpFbSCQquBDwRopzr7M9SuQ2mHgtSChuzxZm/XzRDgKa8205p/j4UFOFhjo 7sB8VJd3dCiTEkChVdkTeXd/7VnGf/nzrLTKow8pXedSCYgmFr6RpwPkclzDVy+PuPvv Ykstgf7tObVGa6+JwEFc4aPRvxZOm4alcrdCFUp1aYulgPpVnbI05J3Ri4r3ii/Oj2Xv B5tNmIwr0j0DxfLgBy2A0pMBKWI7yXX6fz4SEWaeoSVC18XA07julMp1y4T3eq177vpE z4yA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+ymT0YmJG1Tz+FnNHuqsTpPxiICBqTZwyNtUgUIMICHablM21 yz4v/Y/1IwQu5ay2B0u1OK5H1BYJFLiKkQjRAFpWPHF8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwChQ23ZZCXWpsiTNXIc+3ck9J/RW304UWc0nvqaG+p2LZ5Tak+zJdJQzmkOPQCyq3DB7ZtmcimFvDgNixWfWk= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:a21d:: with SMTP id m29mr3595543ool.17.1595495933185; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 02:18:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Srinivasreddy R Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:48:43 +0530 Message-ID: To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-users] fm10k: Not able to strip vlan in hardware X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi All, I have 4 port Nic which works with fm10k driver. vPMD is enabled. I have enabled port_conf.rxmode.hw_vlan_strip in port config. But at rte_eth_rx_burst, I am still seeing vlan tagged traffic. Hardware vlan stripping is not working in my case. Is this a known issue with fm10k vPMD or is there any way to configure hw vlan strip in case of fm10k. Please suggest . I am using dpdk-stable-16.11.7. 4 port NIC with fm10k vPMD enabled. Thanks srinivas