From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <doucette@bu.edu>
Received: from relay60.bu.edu (relay60.bu.edu [128.197.228.60])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D16537B7
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:08:32 +0200 (CEST)
X-Envelope-From: doucette@bu.edu
Received: from mail-wr0-f200.google.com (mail-wr0-f200.google.com
 [209.85.128.200])
 by relay60.bu.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id v5MG8LoZ026335
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 12:08:21 -0400
Received: by mail-wr0-f200.google.com with SMTP id v88so5943632wrb.1
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=uJk1Sh2LMvVCVvlobKkeJFuEXmvRmZ3rV3ZcSWZEP3c=;
 b=SdEjxEmlCVGBfEEFG3LSZCh+r74Yu2QKl6ac89CntcS3Xi0enbvypK/gD8j9hjbcNn
 r3EjmDYLtzNvb0AYvqPkdPVztw8JEpc2VPHbOFGY1/bvxl/R8CPdeR+UNGadwLNzoR0o
 7bxAp2n5n9vUGGFYkE8xQk9YYusE8XDnGrwRJw2VdtN8x2XzXaHqadpQOezJ3QV1apKu
 JjwIli5o8E5jOGVD192J4iLjo+x48tsaDl87nytdq1D5c09LoRyQ7tRq+sKQIRfP+XIE
 2Tc0kAWUu/5fgFvmUOBfJYshebXWZT2D4NCkOB5JmAL2d+jRYC0g1J5bkyFNPeLFUsKi
 t3MQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxsUSMJmzTx8EOMXxw28PF3pWUtU06MwWkTQADBfO1rQq8tf1BF
 YI4cwHxND69D6+IUJfIVpU0T+Yc53/AwyVTu3QvtaO+RJ+1I+hxCsahtIRSCftNjaVYrknWELys
 +kxCpJAJ70Gl6/w==
X-Received: by 10.223.176.124 with SMTP id g57mr2456144wra.190.1498147700343; 
 Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.223.176.124 with SMTP id g57mr2456130wra.190.1498147700022; 
 Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.31.9 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKNYbx0M+=7gMnJGKE7ZS24=Fy7Xsap2PuNcteeXk36NS5WiA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMKNYbx0M+=7gMnJGKE7ZS24=Fy7Xsap2PuNcteeXk36NS5WiA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cody Doucette <doucette@bu.edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 12:08:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJjX64Y=qkDoC+Ny7MNA+Ni=i44X=yUBPKe88yQK2nS8MGK0cQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alex Kiselev <kiselev99@gmail.com>
Cc: users <users@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] KNI interfaces at bonding ports
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:08:32 -0000

Hi Alex,

I previously ran into the same issue. I just used the PCI device
information from the primary slave of the bonded interface:

https://github.com/AltraMayor/gatekeeper/blob/master/cps/main.c#L545

Hope that helps,
Cody

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Alex Kiselev <kiselev99@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello.
>
> Is it possible to create a KNI interface at a bonding port?
>
> My code that works perfectly fine with usual dpdk ports fails
> when I try to use it with bonding ports.
>
>   rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
>   conf.addr = dev_info.pci_dev->addr;
>   ...
>   return rte_kni_alloc(pktmbuf_pool, &conf, &ops);
>
>
> The code fails because pci_dev member of variable dev_info is NULL.
> Is there any workarounds for this problem?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Alexander Kiselev
>