From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B148A00E6
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri,  9 Aug 2019 18:18:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942772082;
	Fri,  9 Aug 2019 18:18:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com (mail-ot1-f68.google.com
 [209.85.210.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F12271
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri,  9 Aug 2019 18:18:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id d17so134811972oth.5
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 09:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=interfacemasters-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=pbqsnhvbh2DFNCO0iHNIzTMy0rdAizPEk1yfZVwYKwc=;
 b=aYMfshazw8eJwMlqF/9vg3WBgRI4WJ2cKFVn4jDHn2ZLKa1eLBnkUFmKQE9+M5S2WO
 lxP8P6ukW9XWJSz4/Qewfa6wrngtm5t9mWO6GUjIrV/Cou7+NaMaGkoeedAvGUa9bhZd
 J+ArQddCJ8iEPRat9dADPnb1M7kZ7m6ZQmkMSqds0/glyY+S/xmT4evPvLJ//iFaW+vF
 +UPF+jDSgDyvvQSVI1tnNq53WpLky+hlOLi6yj7qF8k4a9FX1TnvbnOz5xdhKfCiH1oJ
 b4sEBW711sapSfqpC3WbeXzhfzH0ZASWVxJkHqswWp5M4hiFqU/yIO6dPXH2pJOTGZxu
 1qBA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=pbqsnhvbh2DFNCO0iHNIzTMy0rdAizPEk1yfZVwYKwc=;
 b=nshhH8TbRJuuqCEmQ81sqMREsUTHBSR8gYR96+WaGj/A4pLpGSco57X3tDvLol4FVT
 T6ZxfaS6E+AaMoCXphiLjktpiw2r2Ng9uPgs/N+oor2+kaVZyXrBearBSAy1sL7DQ+0l
 Rdq2BYHLP+QkA2Y17ohHHbim4IWkyLsiWQhklBNF0r45L5oR5p0scphxIxEkQWL0bQhW
 OGRXzwYdneaBoIauUKhXliD507pSwWyqQC9QHUNPP+r9R/rmboueDMPsC21Dk4hZgy74
 a4F87yAsczTQQgArVWn3C+4KiHdpcmAjGRkVw1Va10JE/nk9SGJ62Og24BniO3nFah1X
 mDPg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUaygr9YDfp01sd8XLZHs2wDdXPQC5GTgoMIUjI8i2hb23be87s
 pbvIQnC6ad3siXh7WeGRnsqNhKor9iL75s0NzTXW+n0lwZU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxnhCejMpxEWjVBTcM91TMtx9j+RwldMy3EjHGzCPZLKW30xr4oMyeOiVCylPnsdTaNINOpNY5ypcawq5M7LwQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:200e:: with SMTP id
 e14mr17119997otp.245.1565367522921; 
 Fri, 09 Aug 2019 09:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Volodymyr Veskera <volodymyrv@interfacemasters.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 19:18:32 +0300
Message-ID: <CAJxd2g1WoPHt-iCK4um49QCLCLAKMt_mxBOh5kW53NTdXKTy5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] VLAN tci is not saved in rte_mbuf after HW stripping
	on X710/XL710
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "users" <users-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hello,

I am using XL710 card (FW version - 6.01 0x800034aa 0.0.0, DPDK version -
18.02.2 stable) and faced the next issue:

When VLAN offload feature is configured, in the fist packet provided by the
PMD (after hardware vlan stripping) vlan tci is not saved in
mbuf->vlan_tci. While ol_flags = 451, which tells that PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED
and PKT_RX_VLAN flags were set.
Second and all next packets have correct mbuf->vlan_tci.
This issue reproduces only for VLAN tagged packets with length >= 2000
bytes.

If I am using rte_vlan_strip() for software vlan stripping, I do not see
such a problem.

Please share your thoughts about this.

Regards,
Volodymyr