From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <maverickjin88@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-it1-f181.google.com (mail-it1-f181.google.com
 [209.85.166.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA2B5F14
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri,  2 Nov 2018 22:44:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-it1-f181.google.com with SMTP id m15so5106376itl.4
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 14:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=y/Vh1Wa2/r/6BrSOtDUN0FmghwXZv6KoG7l4QyJk+x0=;
 b=Ls3+xLmYiCbWch5ZSwPn9nrfFGcw47OxbWRSwGSQItCEszK+Q1x8bDcQviDtGGih1e
 aPvHPW7corFmOxl2HCR8oo5E/4+hbd0E4UDlgku3cttgjn+LfxaJGQYzesdZtesDcPBg
 phh2f6EsbF3K4rzMOyGBAtG4vaPOHoPXKXyV8ygw83s+7Pv3lrTuQLnZiOiECjUOsz9V
 PWa/mR9qbjrWwsqDF/ZrBwuoSGFh+9/yx04aKc8uQYQPzTnDWXMozjjnKtDC3DxwY8h+
 RobDP9wL3w9eNj0hUh7/GnbbNdYCsFJnHPIOQbUQpa3TzS+9gyaID/kXXM16MlyFc3XK
 4CQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=y/Vh1Wa2/r/6BrSOtDUN0FmghwXZv6KoG7l4QyJk+x0=;
 b=DHou3hPiGJs/G9aGdXnUHp4Zi64SCIyF6B9yXPdXdo5mZTuEggGj5kK3scQlUbpS6R
 Tf3ChpwdbwFZ3UcJyVUGxEPf8bhewAUnW20ZMnmzhKEiEkbNflI5duhQB89Jd8fCefWF
 ysnPXvbsr3rPlCs37aTQ4SlhOyqaNoKDUR6YzRuXuhFpTLaVIs1QwbW73NZHuMma6IXX
 8PLMuwfNFI4WD6U9xtxZ/XLZKb/3TVuuFMYIPFAX7JqCZDMM/nXE7cvg+JDX6crV2vEL
 peC5/OdhODY0xvuqwhRXeZnMUL0F1rfaV4G7QhjFnlfFGzhg48CiGSiOqJ2AyuRzrUG7
 JQrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKJCBpwJBuEZZpkfZzRJmOdUdKym5VGa6NwOH8ry89+ZdBnaK3f
 nmK/REdz4/3MyTLpuSPddUjuFYBCrJNcHvfgX4H2BeUN
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cpxPvrVOLsZBSge1CRG9usgT0sDqLExIJw7+TxeHYtQvFmJQvroAG/CQ764WcEWjLlvRqfvu4Ut+SoXOmgvDA=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:c408:: with SMTP id v8-v6mr277342itf.131.1541195093312; 
 Fri, 02 Nov 2018 14:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Sungho Hong <maverickjin88@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 14:44:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK8vx=hWGfNb-xAjwpbQ5j3F00K6dyVoh+b8pByu7GPKS1=39Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Is it possible to use multiple ip fragmentation table?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 21:44:54 -0000

Hello DPDK experts,

I am trying to allocate multiple ip frag table for each rx-queue.
For example,

   for loop of rx-queues per logical cores

   if ((rxq->frag_tbl = *rte_ip_frag_table_create*(max_flow_num,
                        IP_FRAG_TBL_BUCKET_ENTRIES, max_flow_num,
frag_cycles,
                        socket)) == NULL) {
       return -1;
   }
    rxq->pool = *rte_pktmbuf_pool_create*(buf, nb_mbuf, MEMPOOL_CACHE_SIZE,
0, RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE, socket);

   for loop end


However I could only create 1 fragmentation table and get the segmentation
fault when I try to allocate the second frag-table for the logical core.

Is it impossible to use multiple frag-table for DPDK?
Because I wanted to avoid a global fragmentation table due to
synchronization issues.