From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <maverickjin88@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-it1-f181.google.com (mail-it1-f181.google.com
 [209.85.166.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09C1F94
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 18:17:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-it1-f181.google.com with SMTP id d6so13763987itl.4
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=q7X3HTGG6ETIuFUqs9VIAobx6aSYINw3C+HGfPdC8qo=;
 b=fCtK4te/EbVRWEe6DN5h1PsAMAYzQIacYMAEAqdEYNmL61vhevIB4aYuJEWeQX04+Z
 eSiav0kTJapuBsKLafd21mG0r60ctT622VzOvbEaRLq4aDIy3mV7nhepLZPUdjJULiGJ
 yvKGdjQADdH4HuX0BeY/vQqper4PZPrtHu2JRt6wWYnypxGbUtuJVld0dohYGh2okGxq
 sW7+j2nbTMGCM+y0EqfdBQRWRsQjI8EkLJ8W2v6zduGV2PwCzggUJ/PzqDtYi3/oxMAu
 tgTVWA4S7vYO/8kaDtdnL0kncpzx3giguJ6tVWzaEtAeFC7qqgms8DpLSG4AYGsRe5VE
 +pSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=q7X3HTGG6ETIuFUqs9VIAobx6aSYINw3C+HGfPdC8qo=;
 b=NX4OOEN5aqSeWW3NoIIljrlEApawxrd2E9Aea4HpMDp2k+rE5wv0RCKSNvOlwGf7MT
 RDf106WMNfzBNA1QsAwr3gZ+z5mBwIyoxXkYjUfe1uJElM/2VGcD1ivIlrawroKImMdZ
 hcoCw2rzIXetMp9YlP560TjjIj49VPsHMWGNTshybRN2bhcgEPjcGuow5KoJbFGjkINa
 l4j6MBNwvAseDA/qaJ+M8BzHTuLpdPTRv0VcvlFChSEHuYIM/mD5I3TaxB02fDeWiK6j
 puNT4VoSgTf4+509RfTs1i6zDfBtCig4nJGBpLk45kdWj+naR/IJMRLg2HTqzqFaVOPR
 QWWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gL3WVYbMbJHao3/JFXDDfxW+pSSWGUwU11UVoiTnLdETGb4srdg
 +d4vcQu0NoA0TVN7xKAJH3pT9+hXVmEETcxcEptFnQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fuTMWMmRR1BB+nloQQPgCrP3VgcMkulYgBUUCaYSNQlaJ6J+x6ObRR7PpML/29VlI0+TkLG+M5tp/a14N4mcI=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:ce03:: with SMTP id v3-v6mr2685595itg.19.1541006235176; 
 Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAK8vx=gepAc=2JK_jDgEhjLSEXSw6bnMfZwRvU8mg4mzc0VvLg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181031081824.373fb415@xeon-e3>
In-Reply-To: <20181031081824.373fb415@xeon-e3>
From: Sungho Hong <maverickjin88@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:17:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK8vx=id8ZbBbiT97byc5vzfCVn8itaXEQnAZzXtbNq70eR1Zg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Ideal design to use ip-fragmentation using
	multiple lcores
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 17:17:16 -0000

Thank you very much for the reply, this cleared things up.

So in that case, I need a single frag-table correct?
so If I want to receive using multiple rx-queues, the fragmented data can
arrive at different queues, which means I cannot have multiple frag-table.

And does this imply that I have to lock the frag-table so that multiple
processes will not affect the consistency?