From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D984A04E6
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:05:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0754DED;
	Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:05:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (mail-wr1-f47.google.com
 [209.85.221.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B552AB
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:05:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 23so11792893wrc.8
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:05:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=akknzuW2+BemXYCsh6XQmmkNE5COV/hcQgyIrTIvd5E=;
 b=DkLSgOHbDVl+ehOTxQtiJ0JQeHrwoPSWvIVmVnLG0RMN4s1jpqnZjiTzgJFuoNfVwv
 R1x7/tWUbtaOb1yDgkWNKhWITMY4SYjk+sWso40C+bi1xT6rerwHkwHNBzyQpIaUqLuO
 4oMjmvOKheMM0xNL36lihfvhUuJZOFe9GIIiZ4Shycs+X7+esMhzwJo3aB5rEeDsV0ZH
 exmMQ0dYs7F5XSfrUPwqP9kDI2np5nYY8wDzVaCC1JO5HdNTnFh/huDzwaXE7Ci05PgL
 qYJcet/QdI7bmndukbMCwEn/22QzNMWpBBIq/DgfztNUdCyQUNutUEU9xrf7nRCLB6uf
 wXPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=akknzuW2+BemXYCsh6XQmmkNE5COV/hcQgyIrTIvd5E=;
 b=miBDFE+m+CNFlK2xtse3mrKMgX7+KBjcJxYC4SzcJGVJlgRAbKl5SCXOtdRwRjE59+
 S+Ii7LAzeCb33J3FzYReSCehVMYb4nvZMflu/EGd3ySDHVYV1MDfKPn0uYl5akN5taND
 Kf9i3wA8dKtI5PMuXI9bsrj/F3/cT1XK4Rntei3ajIGXpj9ROT1RmkzHh8tEu6/aiRcr
 7S9Awca/euPKkO2WnSqWBZg03nf2BfBDFll/PSsnAz958uc2k9WoQG7G8yNr1uVicZIb
 NtsdpM6Uxd+aF0aSXQ2KuZeHgBDB6/YxtuTW7VBdNad59MY1dbo3GRATChIJwj2CbGPi
 Knuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531bW1TXJRUfOGS7iklfZ5qpYIbpntSIKTdt0hA6rLQVqD+uBwO8
 RPoAtl+pp0X23llmKrWsbgQjs6UgwgB39xftQBP88YpUbf8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKDhblnqdHHAJGsMUCStSScrTG6rQf871Oh+39JuxTFVZSbkzMiUmLRVioCzBDJ9eXsPbBrjluST5xwiDsNB4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1c9:: with SMTP id
 t9mr16366591wrx.379.1604999153343; 
 Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:05:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Pavel Vazharov <freakpv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:05:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CAK9EM1_hEk_Wy5wv-F8dDQ+Zj1RQF7ZO1AM+gtLDsrueTbyJ+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: users <users@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Question about RSS hash function
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "users" <users-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi there,

We are testing doing some tests with DPDK 19.11.5 and Intel 82599ES
10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ NIC.
In our scenario we need to make sure that all packets with given
source/destination IPs go on the same queue no matter if they are
fragmented or not.
So, per my understanding, we need the device to support ETH_RSS_IP or at
least (ETH_RSS_IPV4|ETH_RSS_FRAG_IPV4|ETH_RSS_IPV6|ETH_RSS_FRAG_IPV6).
However, the field rte_eth_dev_info.flow_type_rss_offloads reports that
this device supports only (ETH_RSS_IPV4|ETH_RSS_IPV6|ETH_RSS_IPV6_EX).
Here are my questions:
1. It seems to me that the device doesn't support RSS for IPv4/IPv6
fragments?
2. What can be done to achieve the wanted packet distribution if we can't
use the RSS? Do we need to use the rte_flow_* functions?

Thanks,
Pavel.