From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fishforish@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wr0-f170.google.com (mail-wr0-f170.google.com
 [209.85.128.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3361B623
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Wed,  6 Jun 2018 16:29:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wr0-f170.google.com with SMTP id d8-v6so6555286wro.4
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Wed, 06 Jun 2018 07:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=prDjodKxztJNwYtX/KejqC82YNLUW7VYkVCtu8nnDZE=;
 b=sR5PyumjPIuEiaJlxlWBYrH2dneD9xF4la7TUPYih0uFxUjcYzfPK13Yg/bI+RaRPA
 Le8h0Xgtauw4VHXX0nRbKGOzonbNSBumoThmcjjW0742CCkAZD/i4ikxrN/1tMh15BX8
 drVsUCojaoCo8b8Cq1rjQ4Caec0mnz9AFZdCWNBeUZ3LOBmkN/SpoHKp3FflhQEHLsDM
 cS6jkx1yE61khAwWfAD3RJlysER60Io6t1Q3dVa6zXvHKFqzsGGuU6+P7HF2es4ZZnqe
 l9Boxvliy8tkcBivvKRKnQBsjuLPyrMXM3M42thpR9fAIbzEDh4w5AoaPBf2MVcYhKar
 FNxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=prDjodKxztJNwYtX/KejqC82YNLUW7VYkVCtu8nnDZE=;
 b=CMf0DC5kgvqW4Sls2EfZ5wzVxgK/+YSKyNc/T19Ttj7o/vJoTN5GiG3hmR8t+M4c/T
 JiH68niHrhh7GFJYdCdaVDZfgDBir4789BUepCsnyCk1bX9ghXfpogtiV3LheQizZnw8
 NPy+NSEnXYUKz8hK00XALLiAjyQFL4s39JHc0WZ+uUSLSshPZxreCJsXxB55muPFRads
 IM1khf1t1wHp1+iKnW2v4XGjQdMNxLuqcmBWJE7/PTFtM6LiWl9x4J2wt/scetLmYZ0e
 NM3+GldDsU9KmquyY8JIvwqjX9/ZDgM12HFmywwxeQbKYHHyS7KQTa1H0Cd/yC8TzI39
 bQaQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2JE03iQ8cj5cpw803ZbMljphsmt0uen9NGVGNlHCPvdTMeWJ38
 8u6/2gboOEB2b8pHS5J28yI5IoX4IjnQ9rBb0b8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLj17pNiOE8uNRtNf9sqdQp2k+BKpN84AFoZ0UwwppdTuXp1XDIkmHNpsNIvVQoFJ9i4yUCEQ2EqHxy3b8wXNk=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:b86b:: with SMTP id
 u40-v6mr2574449wrf.162.1528295398127; 
 Wed, 06 Jun 2018 07:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a1c:4a93:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP;
 Wed, 6 Jun 2018 07:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin Kall <fishforish@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 10:29:57 -0400
Message-ID: <CAK9TsR0ygQKJVa2sq1hq9SSX_w9EsG=_5gHE5ed+j_zRUC6gmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Multiple UDP ports Per NIC
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 14:29:58 -0000

Hello,

I am brand-new to DPDK (just found out about it) and have what is likely a
simple/stupid question.

Do your libraries/framework allow for different UDP/IP packet streams being
received on a single NIC (different UDP ports) to be directed to/processed
by separate CPU cores (as if each CPU core was opening a different UDP
socket)?

Same goes for transmit - can different CPU cores transmit on separate UDP
ports on a single NIC?

If so, can someone point me to an example?

Thanks so much.

Fish