From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gadrenayan@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com (mail-io0-f169.google.com
 [209.85.223.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3948CEF9
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 20:23:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n127so84380479iof.3
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=v2TZ2CZ5zkIopYXqWI6EhcsdVQcrGLmLb2XL0wZnTto=;
 b=Z7nMnHoHcOS4mQmVY1O5Ei8klT8dETruILkYBLek86O++rnlJCR6IJnaFJCVYot7zd
 +AzqE8kdefK/W8neh3DkAKRqbUXwEHTuoMPLMZZCXviUW9TBOIYdIe9rl1EAURYA23gQ
 KppwX+wN9rEAK1ZakEQXbH82n1fkJpJJ6j/WRy41PCsGqEZcUmusVT/9XgOkahcoYGUz
 aUT0hsykSqV6QTG/fPtTq3WqSklpqU+wtEwkCV5WSgPgwgmbYAstYPVgS1Zf2bcuqEDk
 qdNGzmSA+hdpQutHMCE01Wv1qAyrdE5iMwTOX2KL4P4NaiS5K9nUUg9rqfi9rwbAm8hp
 f9WQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=v2TZ2CZ5zkIopYXqWI6EhcsdVQcrGLmLb2XL0wZnTto=;
 b=FRIzdX3nuJ8lmpQEciffSA6Wkjd2dEcAku+tJJyGQzCuBSIrGBoxDx8Qqr+OuWMA5B
 DOZgoRYu4cl4xba8PtNAP7Bp/XkeMcQl2miRz3m2r251KLv7UFPL6tdPXvrXOE+seZlD
 xhF+75BZqJ8+eklgSqRjqIVAxXFVxIq1DssKBPbguJug0UdXXLEvAFiJk36fP7l1mMJe
 ZciWcEMMH9XeCP/9kz777ALzOYtiamGKv/OeeJLvSQ/wIB5iy2muOIFFU6YRpmEtbfFd
 PZztsQjIx0ohq6rM9YxsTm8gfjmVeK/zy5X1RgPvyvuNCte2XlXYWpuSVVYzrQaWemot
 b0qQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLg2TjvuzHD/3yuXk7ElON/j+6VNXmfWQV+wSlVp1uLHgtixPiQtG1I5lm1DBzijbw6uyh7k/9J2wujXA==
X-Received: by 10.107.159.84 with SMTP id i81mr5417469ioe.29.1466187805210;
 Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.64.86 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gadre Nayan <gadrenayan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:53:24 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKJ7aR6pFdVXJbnG_N+qHdbebKe2jSeufswbNVCjRmPs-yn5eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [dpdk-users] 10G vs 1G interface
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:23:26 -0000

Hi,

Is there any distinction done when KNI interfaces come up for 10G vs 1G ports.

The ifconfig vEth0 down events are not handled reliably for 10G
interfaces. However, for 1G interfaces this works reliably. I get the
interface down events propagated correctly back to user space.

So, if I run ifconfig vEth0 down/up. The appropriate
rte_kni_ops.config_network_if

config_network_if = kni_config_network_interface (where it calls
start/stop functions.)

method is called, and there is no distinction done here for 10G vs 1G.

So where can I tweak the sources or any place elsewhere to get this
issue resolved.

Thanks.
,