From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <shong59@asu.edu>
Received: from mail-yb0-f175.google.com (mail-yb0-f175.google.com
 [209.85.213.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD3C29C8
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 00:26:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-yb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id o84so563639yba.8
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:26:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=asu-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=rsPORN3Ww+yF+nKOqZbyIKvWiI53JoBwAd3fj6XsPng=;
 b=cJOLlno1EBkOG+f5f8mMHHcnErxBMB5P17CJ2f56mZ5d6roG3e4jaYUElTFtJMccVF
 Ri6Z2iOqzal9VVj7ua9p5WjRsdKgrp5o8pnhooRzdPkGCvX9ERWnfIpg7QgvLYQBfs7B
 ilkiUVP2UO45YVgcAij6OrBJ1CHAxymS68b4ZSearCCG0TFZRMCAJiBOSCO5m7PQygo9
 Vq+m5W06tnuFotZLGedOeVoZlP5MXXbPYIxPT82cdEZ0SwDnhGodQo++gnotXsfH0esP
 PXujYrOeYdo2i4fyY4kihxzrzyUaHfqkFzQPDuhz3u8FjVzZuv+o0WJqYHUy3q9rUJjL
 cfoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=rsPORN3Ww+yF+nKOqZbyIKvWiI53JoBwAd3fj6XsPng=;
 b=fXb31/LiLo0iMfRDZRrpH7MaAeeTiJOL11EJD1jfPg4J8RDJQBTkTGZLfojaVVfghQ
 Dkkn4LZ2YRIwkJuaKY9vIAMB7A+GEK/T/q/8Yxv9SnSiMT5+TlMQjy/TVSwilZKC4t1T
 1cybLQVhgz8SY78A2ECbmE4Vva4jPaHTlNvNZqGcLdCk3zl1CWuExXfkxrRkHIomMunq
 u/Z5vxr/8+SoYomEGZzqIlKZs+wXNqDPBtV0aqRC3I+zg3zOOYcp6H83JFps6C1cj3lb
 lw7XBeux/PjjrsgiWud/9UK3H1FGFU7VNpV4HSBx/7htujugO/YNtxj1kN0ULrTSbt+Z
 QYtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKGiN4Fdi4qzprbNbQBMUTWtDrNA9tB3egDERv1vO3iOj3xL0r8
 yP92ZUkC3jAuUOC56u6H2JeqjMfEVG1d8j3OktVu1w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotYA3Rq9RMd1ICT4YcTmNGjRZubPWO6sH88b4ss7FhTE4RQ/ow5iTszqiyMm7D/T5rz4mDfOXdQabAr/wT6AQY=
X-Received: by 10.129.113.134 with SMTP id m128mr7990253ywc.342.1513380417277; 
 Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:26:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.201.135 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:26:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Sungho Hong <shong59@asu.edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:26:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKf1RwDSaD5W0oa8Cdj+OHDP9fwn56kf=0WfuF2SCG=WWNWKzA@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users]  How to check the packet size limit?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 23:26:58 -0000

Hello Team,

I am trying to find the limit of the available size of the packets.

While I was testing with the L2 Forwarding
(sending pingpong packets from client to server(L2 fwd))

I wasn't able to get a good result when I increased my packet size to
2048.
Of course I have changed the default size of the RTE-BUF and the pools for
each client and server before increasing the size of the packets.


Does this problem have to do with the NIC architecture?
If so, is there a document to find out the correct limit size for the
packets?


Thank you for reading this letter
Sungho Hong