From: Rami Rosen <roszenrami@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Wang <andrw.wng@gmail.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] AF_PACKET pmd and linux networking stack
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 00:15:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKoUArk_aXANSNCKkJ=ujbH8m6KPHjfB9yo_CgzqRbhKsLUWuw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANEosPAzArSSEzpDqUfg4nSDLz=2882hPSqNJ5bNxZae=T_Esw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Andrew,
I am not sure at all that there is a way of achieving it, because of the
way AF_PACKET works.
But couldn't you achieve your goal with running DPDK L2FWD or DPDK L3FWD
application ? In such a case, when not working in promiscuous mode, it
seems that this will avoid processing of the packets by the kernel. See the
l2fwd and l3fwd sections in DPDK samples guide.
Regards,
Rami Rosen
בתאריך יום ד׳, 8 באוג׳ 2018, 19:57, מאת Andrew Wang <andrw.wng@gmail.com>:
> Hi
>
> Is there a way of preventing the linux kernel networking stack from
> handling packets when using the AF_PACKET pmd?
>
> Our DPDK app is running on a node that is attracting traffic for a VIP and
> for which it has a blackhole routing rule (to drop all the incoming packets
> for that VIP).
>
> The intention was to have our DPDK app (running on AF_PACKET pmd for now -
> we're still developing the app) grab those packets, process and send them
> out (with a different address).
>
> Right now we can actually see those packets in our dpdk app, we process
> them, give them a different address, but it seems that the linux kernel
> networking stack is still dropping them.
>
> When the blackhole rule is removed we see the outgoing packet with correct
> header, but also a destination unreachable message is sent out, suggesting
> the kernel is also handling the packet. We see the same behavior when using
> iptables to drop packets (instead of blackhole route).
>
> Any suggestions appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-17 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-08 16:57 Andrew Wang
2018-08-17 21:15 ` Rami Rosen [this message]
2018-08-25 14:43 ` Andrew Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKoUArk_aXANSNCKkJ=ujbH8m6KPHjfB9yo_CgzqRbhKsLUWuw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=roszenrami@gmail.com \
--cc=andrw.wng@gmail.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).