From: ".." <hyperhead@gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] VF RSS availble in I350-T2?
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:58:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL0gemM68vSPdhLz+N0+cSb5HE6g6BmCvDcRSiUwKUvQ-ipu1w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0gemPGm7aeaLnFgYGE_NYYdM=PJAW+XLuj5nW8cSKjhM7p1A@mail.gmail.com>
I assume my message was ignored due to it not being related to dpdk
software?
On 11 December 2017 at 10:14, .. <hyperhead@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an intel I350-T2 which I use for SR-IOV, however, I am hitting some
> rx_dropped on the card when I start increasing traffic. (I have got more
> with the same software out of a identical bare metal system)
>
> I am using the Intel igb driver on Centos 7.2 (downloaded from Intel not
> the driver installed with Centos), so the RSS parameters amongst others are
> availbe to me
>
> This then led me to investigate the interrupts on the tx rx ring buffers
> and I noticed that the interface (vfs enabled) only had on tx/rx queue. Its
> distributed between This is on the KVM Host
>
> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4
> CPU5 CPU6 CPU7 CPU8
> 100: 1 33 137 0 0
> 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge ens2f1
> 101: 2224 0 0 6309 178807
> 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge ens2f1-TxRx-0
>
> Looking at my standard nic ethernet ports I see 1 rx and 4 rx queues
>
> On the VM I only get one tx one rx queue ( I know all the interrupts are
> only using CPU0) but that is defined in our builds.
>
> egrep "CPU|ens11" /proc/interrupts
> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4
> CPU5 CPU6 CPU7
> 34: 715885552 0 0 0 0
> 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge ens11-tx-0
> 35: 559402399 0 0 0 0
> 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge ens11-rx-0
>
> I activated RSS in my card, and can set if, however if I use the param
> max_vfs=n then it defaults back to to 1 rx 1 tx queue per nic port
>
> [ 392.833410] igb 0000:07:00.0: Using MSI-X interrupts. 1 rx queue(s), 1
> tx queue(s)
> [ 393.035408] igb 0000:07:00.1: Using MSI-X interrupts. 1 rx queue(s), 1
> tx queue(s)
>
> I have been reading some of the dpdk older posts and see that VF RSS is
> implemented in some cards, does anybody know if its available in this card
> (from reading it only seemed the 10GB cards)
>
> One of my plans aside from trying to create more RSS per VM is to add more
> CPUS to the VM that are not isolated so that the rx and tx queues can
> distribute their load a bit to see if this helps.
>
> Also is it worth investigating the VMDq options, however I understand this
> to be less useful than SR-IOV which works well for me with KVM.
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Rolando
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-12 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-11 9:14 ..
2017-12-12 12:58 ` .. [this message]
2017-12-13 11:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-13 11:35 ` Paul Emmerich
2017-12-13 12:24 ` ..
2017-12-13 12:53 ` ..
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-12-08 9:57 ..
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAL0gemM68vSPdhLz+N0+cSb5HE6g6BmCvDcRSiUwKUvQ-ipu1w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=hyperhead@gmail.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).