From: Igor Gutorov <igootorov@gmail.com>
To: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
Cc: bingz@nvidia.com, dsosnowski@nvidia.com, matan@nvidia.com,
orika@nvidia.com, suanmingm@nvidia.com, users@dpdk.org,
viacheslavo@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: net/mlx5 RTE_ETH_RSS_SCTP support
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 02:50:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL7bPf3o5dYQhPYh3g_snHupGY2U_dGHsF1i4Y2YiLi9Mv4gLQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240929091825.1801231-1-getelson@nvidia.com>
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 12:18 PM Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > I'm wondering about SCTP RSS support in MLX5 NICs.
> > testpmd does not show ipv4-sctp or ipv6-sctp as supported
>
> MLX5 hardware does not offload SCTP RSS.
>
> Regards,
> Gregory
Thank you for the response!
That is unfortunate.
Do you think it is possible to achieve something similar to RSS
offload using the flow engine?
Let me share a bit more about what I'm trying to do. I have a DPDK
application that I want to add SCTP deduplication to.
One of the challenges is that duplicated packets might have different
IP addresses, but identical SCTP layers, causing these duplicates to
be steered to different Rx queues (and hence different threads) by the
default IP RSS offload.
So, I thought I had few options here:
- disable RSS (not really an option, unfortunately)
- software based (computing RSS hash in software and software steering
the packets, or using global lock-free deduplication tables, or so on)
- hardware based, where RSS would be performed on SCTP ports only,
causing the duplicated packets to be steered to the same Rx queues.
This would allow the usage of per thread deduplication tables and
eliminate some overhead from the software based approach.
Since SCTP RSS offload is not supported, do you think it is possible
to "bypass" this limitation? One idea I had is something along these
lines:
- Build an eth / ipv4 pattern. Where the IP item has the proto_id
field unmasked and set to SCTP. This, I'm assuming, effectively
matches SCTP traffic.
- Build a RAW item for each SCTP src and dst port combination.
- Add QUEUE actions to these patterns (with different queues for
different src-dst port combinations in the RAW items).
That would be 2^32 flow rules, which I'd guess the hardware wouldn't
accept that many (haven't checked what the limit is yet).
The number of rules could be then reduced by masking some bits in the RAW item.
All of this sounds a bit ridiculous to be honest, but nevertheless, do
you think this is viable? Any similar ideas / improvements? Perhaps,
is there any chance it is possible to perform RSS on flex items?
Sincerely,
Igor.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-30 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-01 13:01 Igor Gutorov
2024-09-29 9:18 ` Gregory Etelson
2024-09-30 23:50 ` Igor Gutorov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAL7bPf3o5dYQhPYh3g_snHupGY2U_dGHsF1i4Y2YiLi9Mv4gLQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=igootorov@gmail.com \
--cc=bingz@nvidia.com \
--cc=dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
--cc=getelson@nvidia.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=suanmingm@nvidia.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).