From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8885AA04F2
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu,  5 Dec 2019 11:16:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C800E1BF89;
	Thu,  5 Dec 2019 11:16:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-qk1-f180.google.com (mail-qk1-f180.google.com
 [209.85.222.180]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C54E1BF7F
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu,  5 Dec 2019 11:16:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-qk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id i18so2814225qkl.11
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 02:16:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iith.ac.in; s=google;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=TDG1/7qB8IUixvLB5Wi6ltc8EaqxtLsj7F/pzZmOBpk=;
 b=xafvhoA8Q8f+2WuLlDA07OnKiPe9tSwceGauTjbL3rEA0H35S8BtXmTrDDPeNZLnS0
 MH9gmTt2vGtnC3onk2nkyrmoaVMpv6wxYXAAiyEpodKihXpze0IchSqmMdGOT0hme0WV
 paOZbMLoUYUnmolyJyx8BvDGngId+9v7KqY3w=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=TDG1/7qB8IUixvLB5Wi6ltc8EaqxtLsj7F/pzZmOBpk=;
 b=VxRDfLPbtnXJIFocWsXvIkgzdOyUTs8FTmh77w8jqCaWYvljbXYXyHJvi04bP6VqeN
 3ieIW80ChaleVWylqRxs1PDmBMSmkXC5DQJEanNOyDsK/AoBPfupl42ytmbahqh8cAmu
 2QCSUGmv5+LENYkuxV2C52x3AYoDFsJyf1gi7Wdt+ZJHnINolfTz46x9SolDSGOrYP1e
 E1+2HIqjl1DEr/XOwaQOUiCt2hPVy5Xn6jYTCBE0hMXSyPDIDKTYvd/2FLHV8gSva7zB
 mTEEpX2WPOxIZPDlHrthHmVNrjXpYd4w7R0iGxZ+5FlPF1/c6fu8T8iTJie3ft+r2UTm
 gRNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWDoOXtAkHWp/IrfXJ3lSaiKO8e1HNBW3fjtijnL4SifTq+DPQK
 Ew4/VmelMJPTUIjk9/TJf3E8kj9HtY1OKu3n60spTa5xw3w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz3NMWQrPR39qZQKqnnemU5P64hitSwO9jRIrhh6j40A7eypv6nUBw0Id7n7vJ59oZ7H/Y5HKHc8WA7ufb/Woc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1467:: with SMTP id
 j7mr7162282qkl.76.1575540995558; 
 Thu, 05 Dec 2019 02:16:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Perugu Hemasai Chandra Prasad <hemasaiperugu@5g.iith.ac.in>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 15:46:23 +0530
Message-ID: <CALJSgO4nm83cgSThk5ksf_K-qRhx+OXsL9FvuMu4C33hsXekrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Sharing Data structure between logical cores in DPDK-
	regarding
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "users" <users-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi All,
          I have a small doubt, can we share a data structure between
multiple logical cores in DPDK without locking? I have tested it by sharing
a small structure with two variable and incrementing them in all logical
cores. It ran smooth I didn't get any issue. But I doubt if we can run it
for long time with some huge data structure having many elements getting
accessed by multiple logical cores.
     Can anyone please clarify this.

Thanks and regards,
Hemasai.