From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F78A04F3
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 16:58:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627B71C0B8;
	Sun, 29 Dec 2019 16:58:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-qk1-f171.google.com (mail-qk1-f171.google.com
 [209.85.222.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7583F1C0B1
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 16:58:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-qk1-f171.google.com with SMTP id a203so25180964qkc.3
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 07:58:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iith.ac.in; s=google;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=TNnWcndKS4TquwuBRvhGD3bgcHS/0j2wTLripaIzs6Q=;
 b=R84Ur/hDF2sxlFUHHZdgbwsndvkEfz6BrBdH8QyePyia0Ee1MnvJvZ/NiTcxN1gyMu
 vbxfDHMCSx0hjVm84Yde2CDFA17UoBtuozjicWdNM5sSHq2J+Bj3rcEQSJx8fnZP39d5
 NHeAo6vz5zTAX8hNT1uWkuPC6BkFhEwmv+4B0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=TNnWcndKS4TquwuBRvhGD3bgcHS/0j2wTLripaIzs6Q=;
 b=gktAPOnVaBYtelXEUoZVte6JXcpa57ZIiTyAReVJnuQZTimdIR2WxrWliE/YzUKR4B
 Jate7wW9lo8UaVNrVugtBtwWXQwB2Lu/Usl2F/jXGhvnLebj2qjonRZTNfxbFJICJLYw
 SBP2hSeYsfY8gvmv+J2+rjEWfixlaQ18u4Fqo/mXkBFBrkM2zbxGX80Ma8m3xWQ4fjVx
 6s262Gepuu7/Gc/3FOROs4dJkpuy83fV60rz+EAlOt4kQfkzUkCyHMdvKaWY85v/tbnH
 YFHsF1cgM8z2wltvxKzpUG2hY0UfgS2rwXaKKU+KudHrhJafBH6zlOpbOylI8eHHlFqN
 emBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUGQuqGPgKpLVIPknj/FieUdzJKh9nVA373gKA5jd+6kaYVrUS1
 moK+mvVuGKirIun6N04zOc3EKcekZolQPAHLOdvUw9iTJ3uVnA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxSbCAgaZTY4WW7sy3nP/SCZmb3qA4YRQIaOdj1INZKtf4biuCP3260iX1APzbo9jghLuxsYPral3QWbnHH3Zw=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:ac16:: with SMTP id e22mr51157412qkm.186.1577635092656; 
 Sun, 29 Dec 2019 07:58:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Perugu Hemasai Chandra Prasad <hemasaiperugu@5g.iith.ac.in>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:28:01 +0530
Message-ID: <CALJSgO6kQpX-_7fykrLExM=MdyCmhn99_WVMrdjyhBJYZqth9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] segmentation fault in rte_eal_wait_lcore - regarding.
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "users" <users-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi All,
         I have a segmentation fault issue regarding ret_eal_wait_lcore and
rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(),
I am running the code in a few logical cores using rte_eal_remote _launch()
function which has a  while (1) (infinite loop) in all the functions
launched by remote launch and when i am terminating the code with 'ctrl+c'
i am getting segmentation fault at  rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(), then I
replaced that with rte_eal_wait_lcore() for the respective logical cores
even then i am getting a segmentation fault, can anyone please clarify this
issue?

Thanks & Regards,
Hemasai