From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C86A04B1
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 01:40:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CB0F90;
	Wed, 26 Aug 2020 01:40:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-ot1-f51.google.com (mail-ot1-f51.google.com
 [209.85.210.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6AB1BFF3
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 05:02:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id r21so6526614ota.10
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 20:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=MiFr+KTLkGvjz4/EL71t4YuVAzzoqneAN3cxu6W5I78=;
 b=UUpPK5Gzzhf4y0PBx+FgtowgJZJmEiBeNjSaCPi6HCjy0Xpj6mfm3yYc3WN08W24Bc
 ijQRGZU9BngKADbvuhdyr72H6C9EzAyBHWl8bII26CyTCyAv39KBf8amMFhjtqHF2uG5
 5mZ1x3XRQYYHc/5Frro9tWARLF+CDy1exkIuXhFZbIpOR/6UMuiRK6XVDVdPs1GceZDO
 Xm0PWDbtaNMI7USLnMMx/ZtP8nNxtFpSiaxPcgKN4iX7Y8dwiJxs8IlsJXa1U+wTIdX+
 yBMrMwHm1iGOudGObdd9MwhXy2DERA4rOiCN2f3piXFnMg+29xFYLcF+7Mm6jx+KbSka
 VNwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=MiFr+KTLkGvjz4/EL71t4YuVAzzoqneAN3cxu6W5I78=;
 b=nxRy5wsVVRihEMqZ8gDlo9eSayHF5bPRaLBgHcbXtoy7nO+Irkm/vKUWm9b6vzuTD/
 TndvYtguwKWSVKnb6cdbEyO6elzSd6USKjc1zyVebgCWPieQl8lG4lYv5APzqRnSWcLw
 lRvffTGLLqnC8YjT+UfUmafu4yqjZeAVsWkf16WhKuwUVyJNmS/dfj7eKZ2fR+NfLUUJ
 ts/tWImg+P21raY2WnivxiRvUVveb9ceS6BJZhyzgRiY/uuo5MJYIWRsWt+kBED0fKrC
 jJ7MH/VLZRF1vAtS2Us+FSz5l4qJ5QbR6skXyIuDQ+zfM9KpMXIgRKStGk8+KgwNRm6o
 s5Eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533x1i931RrBh5N82x9jVVxq5RV7+HxprkG1c0IbDdHm/OUNgp+f
 c/K8u8/kH1JHBO4d6hJHF0WO9VmgHOZ2MYcZU+QQWvh7qOA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9GNOVO5Q908yBQ7Ncd1Knjf229ZX3XMnDb/2KJisIHQkJhbpDYSCOBFGFLaWGIwFfTAEdjIPsL2XzXJHHxOI=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7994:: with SMTP id h20mr552046otm.317.1597374148642; 
 Thu, 13 Aug 2020 20:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Lego Lin <lego.lin@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:02:17 +0800
Message-ID: <CALR1Az+iCR2=GO=5pz4-0h7uWieW0PVod19t0s+Cf=cd+ukGLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 01:40:45 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Memory consumption of struct rte_ring
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "users" <users-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi, everyone:

I am new for DPDK. Recently, I leveraged the DPDK library to address some
performance issues.
1. rte_ring
2. rte_rwlock_t

I have some questions
1. For rte_ring, what is the exact memory consumption?
    Example: I want create a rte_ring with size = 512K
    struct rte_ring * myring = rte_ring_create("My_test", 512*1024,
SOCKET_ANY, MP_SC)
    Before I enqueue anything into ring, what is the exact memory
consumption of myring?

2. rte_rwlock_t
    Will rte_rwlock_t guarantee memory barrier? It looks like only protect
data from thread accessing.

Thanks