DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shihabur Rahman Chowdhury <shihab.buet@gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-users] Low Rx throughput when using Mellanox ConnectX-3 card with DPDK
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:00:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMGVCn7hrPKj-3pV-THv0BHQw9hWRD=C4V1R-18ydFWR_B14ZA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,

We are running a simple DPDK application and observing quite low
throughput. We are currently testing a DPDK application with the following
setup

- 2 machines with 2xIntel Xeon E5-2620 CPUs
- Each machine with a Mellanox single port 10G ConnectX3 card
- Mellanox DPDK version 16.11
- Mellanox OFED 4.0-2.0.0.1 and latest firmware for ConnectX3

The application is doing almost nothing. It is reading a batch of 64
packets from a single rxq, swapping the mac of each packet and writing it
back to a single txq. The rx and tx is being handled by separate lcores on
the same NUMA socket. We are running pktgen on another machine. With 64B
sized packets we are seeing ~14.8Mpps Tx rate and ~7.3Mpps Rx rate in
pktgen. We checked the NIC on the machine running the DPDK application
(with ifconfig) and it looks like there is a large number of packets being
dropped by the interface. Our connectx3 card should be theoretically be
able to handle 10Gbps Rx + 10Gbps Tx throughput (with channel width 4, the
theoretical max on PCIe 3.0 should be ~31.2Gbps). Interestingly, when Tx
rate is reduced in pktgent (to ~9Mpps), the Rx rate increases to ~9Mpps.

We would highly appriciate if we could get some pointers as to what can be
possibly causing this mismatch in Rx and Tx. Ideally, we should be able to
see ~14Mpps Rx well. Is it because we are using a single port? Or something
else?

FYI, we also ran the sample l2fwd application and test-pmd and got
comparable results in the same setup.

Thanks
Shihab

             reply	other threads:[~2017-04-12 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-12 21:00 Shihabur Rahman Chowdhury [this message]
2017-04-12 22:41 ` Wiles, Keith
2017-04-13  0:06   ` Shihabur Rahman Chowdhury
2017-04-13  1:56     ` Dave Wallace
2017-04-13  1:57       ` Shihabur Rahman Chowdhury
2017-04-13  5:19         ` Shahaf Shuler
2017-04-13 14:21           ` Shihabur Rahman Chowdhury
2017-04-13 15:49             ` Kyle Larose
2017-04-17 17:43               ` Shihabur Rahman Chowdhury
2017-04-13 13:49     ` Wiles, Keith
2017-04-13 14:22       ` Shihabur Rahman Chowdhury
2017-04-13 14:47         ` Wiles, Keith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMGVCn7hrPKj-3pV-THv0BHQw9hWRD=C4V1R-18ydFWR_B14ZA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=shihab.buet@gmail.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).