From: Chinmaya Dwibedy <ckdwibedy@gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Memory requirements for crypto devices (QAT and AESNI) (using DPDK-17.02)
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 19:24:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMHS8RGH=D1wtNzhh7rV7-qEXfFnCSxHf1fqRw2NtJEKRvuorQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMHS8RFweKQAhsf+LC4Yo3mNKjez9r7g+=Qb6pD9n-torkdvFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Can anyone please respond to this email ? Thank you in advance for your
suggestion and time.
Regards,
Chinmaya
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Chinmaya Dwibedy <ckdwibedy@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> We are using DPK-17.02. We use crypto via hardware (QAT) and software
> acceleration (AESNI). There is one to one mapping between crypto Dev and
> worker core. What are the memory requirements for the below stated
>
> 1) Creation of one physical Crypto device.
>
> 2) Creation of one AESNI MB virtual Crypto device.
>
> Thereafter we configure a device with the default number of queue pairs to
> set up for the device as shown below.
>
>
> #define CDEV_MP_CACHE_SZ 64
>
> rte_cryptodev_info_get(cdev_id, &info);
>
> dev_conf.nb_queue_pairs = info.max_nb_queue_pairs;
>
> dev_conf.session_mp.nb_objs = info.sym.max_nb_sessions;
>
> dev_conf.socket_id = SOCKET_ID_ANY;
>
> dev_conf.session_mp.cache_size = CDEV_MP_CACHE_SZ;
>
> rte_cryptodev_configure (cdev_id, &dev_conf);
>
>
> How to calculate the minimum memory required to configure per HW and per
> SW crypto device. Then we allocate and set up a receive queue pair for a
> device as follows. As of now we use one queue per device and number of
> descriptors per queue pair is set to 2k. If we increase the number of
> descriptors, will it improve the performance in terms of throughput?
>
>
> #define CDEV_MP_NB_OBJS 2048
>
> qp_conf.nb_descriptors = CDEV_MP_NB_OBJS;
>
> rte_cryptodev_queue_pair_setup (cdev_id, 0, &qp_conf, dev_conf.socket_id)
>
>
> We create a session for symmetric cryptographic operations per IPsec
> Security association. What is the memory required to hold session data
> structure?
>
>
> The intent behind this is to calculate the memory requirements in advance
> (before EAL initialization) and based upon the available memory, figure out
> how many crypto devices (note: our application initializes AESNI vdev
> without using EAL command line option) can be initialized? Say there are 24
> worker cores and we need 24 crypto AESNI vdevs. But there is no sufficient
> hugepage memory for creating 24 crypto AESNI vdevs. In such case, we will
> allocate more hugepages , then call rte_eal_init() and expect it to be
> passed.
>
>
> Thank you in advance for your suggestion and time.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Chinmaya
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-08 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-05 12:50 Chinmaya Dwibedy
2017-05-08 13:54 ` Chinmaya Dwibedy [this message]
2017-05-09 15:52 ` Trahe, Fiona
2017-05-10 9:35 ` Chinmaya Dwibedy
2017-05-15 11:52 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2017-05-16 5:51 ` Chinmaya Dwibedy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMHS8RGH=D1wtNzhh7rV7-qEXfFnCSxHf1fqRw2NtJEKRvuorQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ckdwibedy@gmail.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).