From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kiselev99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (mail-io0-f181.google.com
 [209.85.223.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8B64C57
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:06:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-io0-f181.google.com with SMTP id t87so19125493ioe.0
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 02:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=wJL9P5kLWCyupkkkK0vM7xTha+pJktWWjLHZgLlmBlI=;
 b=gGk4+Qvsb0vPyO+9rhSKp3nT2u7Vp9+yMDBwdecDyqhC2WVYa1X4cVtEotNbCFEcex
 0EcWAFpEuxHJHorjnEywIXHN36JizUffDCRZAqnlMGGZvuHW8YxxTMJoFCl+EdgvUhi9
 s5LE1VhFZS+LIc0RIdblAUlyO5gh2qH2MCOiAE1X7SnnhxFDIX9Oapeg3ppyqsazkM3I
 +Zwwf5YDenCT5ZJrwReaF1NpE1RCOEX/RxrjrmVDPqbpWzr330ThvnVWYKdB3BfZV4f+
 xOQnHIHszgL+4sdw2Yusk+rB4MYBDtu3pRDjmTMxIZipVaebPKnNeWwAW7GQLcG1x6Xk
 KKlw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=wJL9P5kLWCyupkkkK0vM7xTha+pJktWWjLHZgLlmBlI=;
 b=PM/AMKh9DOQC7JkHens5kprloT6eNsKztN7vs45XKFnAbpQ98PP+Wc+/DmdzLxJNvl
 SJesklz5PaHnrBGyqCxqpG70e7PGZ+HNvnZqJ8uBsV0clUNRUVVExuCrvQ7+exIE8yrn
 /E3MD7dA01TpeOsxImCBLmXaNIeHxvdLIkbeLJ9S1v+ICF6AbPAz6wRZIdmSJ8qmEuqJ
 z1/rXzejm2T814zUluwG0naBgumRxZuRhGkqYmPcO84i1p5qfmtq1LjmI6eZ1ifIOoXx
 GPEw06L7l7W+MpdBa9ONkcWpFoDTHl03B21K2gV6HKTQr8B6kOxdSLJm6WiXQLaYciMV
 srsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOx0kO+AJuZ2RgiQjZwqRkOLXMWR/J+FmC8lMYTRtQIF9MLdo62S
 zu4yi3Gi2UR3b/8pbjLNokbDkMFxlvJL
X-Received: by 10.107.35.14 with SMTP id j14mr1235071ioj.228.1498122376088;
 Thu, 22 Jun 2017 02:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.10.89 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 02:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alex Kiselev <kiselev99@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 12:06:15 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMKNYbx0M+=7gMnJGKE7ZS24=Fy7Xsap2PuNcteeXk36NS5WiA@mail.gmail.com>
To: users <users@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: [dpdk-users] KNI interfaces at bonding ports
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:06:17 -0000

Hello.

Is it possible to create a KNI interface at a bonding port?

My code that works perfectly fine with usual dpdk ports fails
when I try to use it with bonding ports.

  rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
  conf.addr = dev_info.pci_dev->addr;
  ...
  return rte_kni_alloc(pktmbuf_pool, &conf, &ops);


The code fails because pci_dev member of variable dev_info is NULL.
Is there any workarounds for this problem?

Thanks.

--
Alexander Kiselev