From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kiselev99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com (mail-io0-f174.google.com
 [209.85.223.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C402BB5
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 13:37:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-io0-f174.google.com with SMTP id e20so10388634iof.12
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 04:37:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=dou5I8m4l86F5OjQ+S0WbsiN89XnyLGv6ek7XRISdzo=;
 b=qrfzPMlzSLKFvc8vZ0fPgCsXHmFNk3ejuT7HnIHgOomT7S/oZX+FG4UPRY5W/l4rVw
 8MK2ju45mFVpnk4XeRYg7Pd9nl2YKiqJdv/+WDKfofeNBe3m7Tq9adNsKuNxsm00AcxE
 Enby+f8l2XeavW6njQM/2AQHp/YL5ihlNKDoen2SnzGx1YqGPqQPotvKQoD/QicOmFBx
 8InUpwPTrbZE2NF8shV8SxlZrNzGzGz18NJ+WOs7jsHL28dorm5woPOlXY4dStF5QF+L
 yM0l6LaM1mr6mSK9bhDQTyqG6CAbd2pQqtnUE50pt5zYOGFcarzpX1+EP1TVsXGBDUEv
 3mmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=dou5I8m4l86F5OjQ+S0WbsiN89XnyLGv6ek7XRISdzo=;
 b=fBzYWm8eTdYeMSS4npcdPR4LU6bAKj1Qt5wRbeQ1GsMFKG9EvHZBwld68yWIcMHz31
 lT6y6lLSvkOdkDzc3lJWJS1ZzznzqILIPiTPlTMoSSjluWWx2BohgZhHc+aMk3K1cpLu
 BLrkX/2Kl4m1dOIutAFZ9ONDPB9bbLV3x2snXO1PcT0ygb5D1/FeLSLWO8+hN1mEhSN8
 ushBwI/ODvuD4n23TyNPR4LjTTkHRZjuRLpMzd+jwRfYHJ8neFPM4g14FtBYyOP725T+
 C8m/6+i2k8jsmp1X//ymKNwmizefKqgABE4eI/fjqQ06l/VAmGCuSns8wHI09T9IG2dd
 66AQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytd5yTY6bRiOOBjKLXaj6l+whzRlGGn3Sdfqfhwkwkjf/+CCsyrC
 gE3dWdwprHhY3LUaRGO9fhAEpHSwrXW821hidIyd6Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosHOI8Z88Bj0hcDdi5j9+lV8bLh2iUpNpws9MPTbip7Z/VgrBLDh0A6JnNvrt8qlgmiZ4ETvnMCFdOYU1CT4tE=
X-Received: by 10.107.140.88 with SMTP id o85mr4428665iod.219.1515933437226;
 Sun, 14 Jan 2018 04:37:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.26.148 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 04:37:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Alex Kiselev <kiselev99@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:37:16 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMKNYby622gh3zihj+6Jv0eQiVRwA=oYGSHFpYz9ahpTDWM+HA@mail.gmail.com>
To: users <users@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: [dpdk-users] assert failure while allocating cmbuf
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:37:18 -0000

Hi.

I've got an error in my application and I need an advice how to find
what could cause it.
The error was RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 0) failure in
rte_mbuf_raw_alloc()
while my app was trying to allocate a new mbuf from a control memory
buffer pool using
rte_ctrlmbuf_alloc(). So, that kinda mbufs are used only for passing
messages via rings in my app.

What should I look for in order to find a bug in my app?

Thank you.

P.S.
So far I've got only one occurrence of the bug and I am trying to
reproduce it running
the same stress test.

-- 
Alex Kiselev