From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kiselev99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com (mail-it0-f48.google.com
 [209.85.214.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E0A37A0
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:49:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-it0-f48.google.com with SMTP id v202so43342711itb.0
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 03:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=+hAhqsdYj41d47yybsybsHnH6YQnlkYwxR8LCQCU6kA=;
 b=jpCLcta4+EAVekm3RS+rtHGkDto8iqZaU7lHxRqVeVcNwr84NAMuVCbMxxm6sv17o0
 44n23Vd1bfv74DVngCv7VIVz+aB1CcUfJXcFSphnSp/DRYouCHSX12HXu0mc3xXSSOLG
 lvq8PVFDiKVzwvZ0nF4/Bj5/Xmev32FRzQAlgjkDnu6obY23xIAXFZ2OlTQxh4aAo23g
 2ZtlZMSej/u0gAOh9sfJq3+CYnA09lrtI3pVIrN+jrrafLGdKtTY5njGoc5+ae9VhZss
 jYkqbQlsVe6w2ts05l5fscjF5OBvz6j6I9uxNma2jKodIbpiQ5pqU60gaGQB6JXW40kf
 LWBQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=+hAhqsdYj41d47yybsybsHnH6YQnlkYwxR8LCQCU6kA=;
 b=LOu04jwqKlMe112JzM5Xy3HYNYbzz7x1k7oEJajVI+VeUzcvZmQ2lkdWTFdlPoUQab
 N50gOSQQKE5OiTxeXrmRxMB+TNhAeNRXq3jlGwzV1gtwG/r6Nk4dpjuBp04D10AMo+dW
 llZXGh8Hu3H1L+RbIbsehgQDofYPKSq0b7KQm3Uq7/Ll6wTP+YKgRBHamEj7LkLN9O4B
 8vbjiV2Q/IB6KtGJ6phWhojcVDM0vJ9TquRgSKgBsRnwqP00jR0WsaWFdwZW6l+XsGVj
 vYxXA3nUZxjexthDPXDb/FlOxlgixR9lN4zRQgnq5UkygJWWKhug0Ndn5p+yP+TsAQix
 D0Ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOx+PPgw9wVV/CLzkkufPnOJGDAQJjTQY2X84qrdtof/PEIP14k/
 qgwA0WvDc3zGhdTmYYjiOWzAAIG2PVfP
X-Received: by 10.36.146.133 with SMTP id l127mr13588877itd.102.1498733377940; 
 Thu, 29 Jun 2017 03:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.133.86 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 03:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alex Kiselev <kiselev99@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:49:37 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMKNYbyFuOa+R4r6qWcdm3x-XoT_MfJ+4rxF0tWBdrbhyyccAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: users <users@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: [dpdk-users] link bonding driver, lacp mode
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 10:49:39 -0000

Hello.

I am facing another issue with LACP LAG port.

Jun 29 13:24:40 h4 the_router[24361]: PMD: Failed to allocate LACP
packet from pool

There are thousands of such messages in the syslog.
But my app was working ok at the same time.
The mbuf pool that is used to setup rx queues (rte_eth_rx_queue_setup)
was ok too.

So, is it a mbuf leak in the bonding driver?


P.S.
Does anybody have a success story working with LACP bonding ports?


--
Alex Kiselev