From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kiselev99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-io0-f177.google.com (mail-io0-f177.google.com
 [209.85.223.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA39437A0
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:25:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-io0-f177.google.com with SMTP id h134so21547863iof.2
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=YkDg9i0n2LnncK8GIRfbNNeMPW1VQx4gWN5qWXnpZWE=;
 b=BEO1IcKv5XNzDo9qeksRySSJy0stApj3tN207PdZTmiJVjevKXqLUHIohMnnqAAWgU
 1Tdf+x+zLs+79kg668IUy920pY4H37DaSelVBOe2V2kNKe7Iqi6slUCbvdM54CUOnppB
 sAoS02L5zZdF+R+eT11d8Hc4qbvOJSreIu5PRHbCXPDXDvsxKQg1T91lXwc/Z8FzXUMd
 GCRTErVLDmXQOu8Q9lhPRZf/DLj7C0YmpYG9Fvr5L3rQfsGWnIoZRezElEH76nO+k3Xr
 /iu7/ToPZBdsTXya7lVuKh3LX748V7pnuYpil6fXhPNuHQYY4A6UtqjLg6J04SMZuW0V
 7gQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=YkDg9i0n2LnncK8GIRfbNNeMPW1VQx4gWN5qWXnpZWE=;
 b=fs+uTN/kClZc0xKVskg/VwaIX6cxxq0tMrKbnQyjqy1nYqnsmcvefTr+vy14kiPERR
 6j5y9PywlA179jfgqHB+S+3bMcLkUiLGBCiW4/lzbowvVACCHsv8ReJL6A8xGPO00EVe
 sfxeCzoYXQPzrEWO1WP1bnet6Jb7AQgUjfSwp/24cckLI895T08xy1Qx70HoZF4RHpRo
 HLjzPeGuGrsTAnQ0gEBXJNE1tuvxbWohfT1VDT/2Iish3jamNZ117qP38zwGAx5SHTM6
 swGpqENnWTVnXbDZr7qCb8ncBlTjBYxhSwBauZ9N0iUo7xbFQVx2Te1xnJYyoo38tV+j
 BxVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzNZZ6YWaHN8xLUWWTHqOYxkYIIsXWN6TaMfc44MZgCMKUAr297
 BoPLSW6xvBvPHJXzubw6i0zuGfZ4TQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.35.14 with SMTP id j14mr4129720ioj.228.1498163150057;
 Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.10.89 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJjX64Y=qkDoC+Ny7MNA+Ni=i44X=yUBPKe88yQK2nS8MGK0cQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMKNYbx0M+=7gMnJGKE7ZS24=Fy7Xsap2PuNcteeXk36NS5WiA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJjX64Y=qkDoC+Ny7MNA+Ni=i44X=yUBPKe88yQK2nS8MGK0cQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alex Kiselev <kiselev99@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 23:25:49 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMKNYbycZ_X705s2MLX1=d=UwKSp=hwmSw_rF5vpGsexrxyGCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cody Doucette <doucette@bu.edu>, users <users@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] KNI interfaces at bonding ports
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:25:51 -0000

Hi, Cody. Thank you. It helped.
rte_eth_bond_primary_get() function is exactly what I needed.


2017-06-22 19:08 GMT+03:00 Cody Doucette <doucette@bu.edu>:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I previously ran into the same issue. I just used the PCI device information
> from the primary slave of the bonded interface:
>
> https://github.com/AltraMayor/gatekeeper/blob/master/cps/main.c#L545
>
> Hope that helps,
> Cody
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Alex Kiselev <kiselev99@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Is it possible to create a KNI interface at a bonding port?
>>
>> My code that works perfectly fine with usual dpdk ports fails
>> when I try to use it with bonding ports.
>>
>>   rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
>>   conf.addr = dev_info.pci_dev->addr;
>>   ...
>>   return rte_kni_alloc(pktmbuf_pool, &conf, &ops);
>>
>>
>> The code fails because pci_dev member of variable dev_info is NULL.
>> Is there any workarounds for this problem?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Alexander Kiselev
>
>



-- 
--
Kiselev Alexander