From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kiselev99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com (mail-it0-f42.google.com
 [209.85.214.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E44271
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:11:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id k192so5752235ith.1
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 05:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=NtESzr+KsLcYBLwnb2QRnzNe/m3Bukb8M5tqI2KcYQA=;
 b=YLVWiZMPw7ipnCr+T4KRaTYofzQ5WqLdsYfKqjB5sJctpLG17afxz7zP5oPFDYrQt/
 g0iPruUyoIJ7v4a2ySQpRkeQukOKE5bSXGUdDRn33QV2HdLfCpQokCfBWeGjw0b2Gll5
 dPFjVuWJ1+0zco1/OzE+lIPzFMCSg37pq37SUtkTPm8j+3ixGpClBbTaRlwWTEL9QDfq
 e9NWHOuBb4nQAXmt3kzg5TjDQi/0FksWsa6NrDDJ7zIIUGen9V9MxDGVHXu89HKOQ8nc
 i9+XLmP5C3/hmCdG7gq5BURmE0kt5DLd+ZvMxMakp0UZK8KXsvK5G2QQ403PCJ4osMGs
 45qQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=NtESzr+KsLcYBLwnb2QRnzNe/m3Bukb8M5tqI2KcYQA=;
 b=gmVA9uFPTQEXwAiAAsv1Ru18LwVIsWttUH+sGR0ClD5boztNuYOYxd2MiO5e+EvyE8
 5Ht4ctOA1pW38hy1Y5eC/n1ZWOR3G0eDU56DVKN6LJ4nD2byHeX7VQ1im69i1z+VQABg
 8PZMhf0qe/mCd7tZL6uiAsqIZUfnuZWA6alK5/ntJj+EwYNIqTcECqeygXJSfBKHWW6A
 UJOnwe95oDqJw6rY0xEFxz7pi2bUoV6up4OWfLRPq56+gXQEvH9gQMaXZwt8R5mwESU3
 TnqIqbptQ1zYlHZYbUd1khf1y1ufXzry5/pVERIOoPwMzxSWkIKFaXxfXUiAHyxvLWSu
 K5qw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwxXvKhnjGMrpHPXngV9ooJNm3tWETB1gRRVzqYWnkuHk6Ow/w8
 NBMRd7c2R8M7Yf+QmW2eXVi+AnOwDqiu
X-Received: by 10.36.48.146 with SMTP id q140mr1571654itq.59.1498738279554;
 Thu, 29 Jun 2017 05:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.133.86 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 05:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alex Kiselev <kiselev99@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:11:19 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMKNYbzgjUKeAOPdMdY6CiW9cnFtEJHH-byG24WQH++mjy995g@mail.gmail.com>
To: users <users@dpdk.org>
Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com, 
 olivier.matz@6wind.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: [dpdk-users] another fix to LACP mempool size
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:11:21 -0000

>I am facing another issue with LACP LAG port.
>
>Jun 29 13:24:40 h4 the_router[24361]: PMD: Failed to allocate LACP
>packet from pool
>
>There are thousands of such messages in the syslog.
>...
>Alex Kiselev

It looks like It is the same issue that was descovered
here http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-November/049971.html

Was there reasons not to include that patch into the main code?

-- 
--
Alex Kiselev