From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <waqasahmed1471@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (mail-oi0-f52.google.com
 [209.85.218.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0F14CBD
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 20:19:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id p84-v6so23295101oic.4
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 11:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=uJS9oo4W0y18Og9uQySDZdYPf43COhBMjYub5p751Zo=;
 b=R8b01zTxxPGYiWr3So6grkvBGqwrq2fGze8isJh4jlUu4mGSTsZMzPFWd1xotQMyVZ
 pg0M7EoP+6Gkcm8lqVqEsGKrfLxAuGAdLVj5yRd/MaeY1Sj+FZGVN/GdG0uZG0CKBRVQ
 xERXy59fArqhjJqDimkLRLpGBoR9yaJ7JRWU2FEoCTIFavwLHbk0M0nZP7gBpCNJpjFY
 99jEcCnqlLlb9LWzhYjTtTpyzQzXH5/wobGEL+VKG0mUCObDiJyGTcfhPVWlCv9gzUTg
 /E/Em/4ZtVBlE1cXOq+pcVrU1u7fRvlhg6yMFRDrLCXCeEx+1Aqz1N7DH/pbjB726Wg7
 Wmzw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=uJS9oo4W0y18Og9uQySDZdYPf43COhBMjYub5p751Zo=;
 b=erTTsUvkqAd/3npCs56qPbMSEkXwiRV6FZUKryN5QioZdklC258dCQ8bynHm5qJ4c6
 6HSLhpxWh2PbumqvxZqiHuSD5bNFDUuQJOGpY4KwJcJl1In8Xk3JkoppwsrsiDeipvmS
 N3HEkpPdE8ts6lWjiUNRw5jHQ9yN+5tuV810sEL7mQRBVMC0xJmTW1jc4v6990X+jUrT
 /dIOwZG9TFhjYUWXG9QrBf/wYyQygWl1gpHo+xbQNj4xShOLL5ceJLcmFFHUKvuboVFv
 nmV8Flv0UNKt50MXLAGbY8nDGrlCXmvp3fDXPb01sgLvKw7P2DlrMv3h3vTFzyINGJ2i
 NLjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BqM5DbqzMu1wVPxEbL+OSIZJgP0kdcja08ayXEU5gQXysYciAw
 tRHXljFnmugr2QA6Bvvvd9jiTri1fjxbxSbH+XY7Rw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZEw5Qa7c4o7L9MoOctICtSercnDp5eLPfCRDCwoszUTvCfJY5p+teRz4ey8R1iWE1tU5Qrt/ze7iH6LVEOrJs=
X-Received: by 2002:a54:448b:: with SMTP id
 v11-v6mr9007106oiv.208.1535739590765; 
 Fri, 31 Aug 2018 11:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: waqas ahmed <waqasahmed1471@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 23:19:38 +0500
Message-ID: <CAMr3K=eRnfQg=1m_DqmQ9ccw0mrADJ+xeLWE8t7JJ6qa1V4oZw@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Frame Check Sequence is incorrect?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 18:19:52 -0000

Hi Everyone,
i have kvm with two ports, i am getting rtp stream from port 0 and just
change source ip of each packet and recalculate ipv4 checksum. then same
pkt mbuf is got rte_eth_tx_burst from port1.
but on vm2 wireshark shows that Frame check sequence is incorrect, that
seems that while getting same mbuf out from port1 cant get FCS
recalculated? by emulated nic.
kind regards and any help is appreciated.