From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tnakamura.dpdk@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-f67.google.com (mail-oi0-f67.google.com
 [209.85.218.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9792BAE
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 06:18:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-oi0-f67.google.com with SMTP id 184so10833462oii.2
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 21:18:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=nAVFOQWcbTu+yqKVnimtCnDzszCU3eLkepCRJBaTvzI=;
 b=m5Uh3QPKMggwAQ0vpbdnyiSKxwVTy3aLahFvmVAGZRaieSW/sDuqdLK22zth0M3BkB
 MdspAiDMjg3Ic0h9eZTSwGz3M7/YNxIwNfRTQymCoNis93lfM1HApaXk5Zs1CNOCOTqO
 fwpM+7XSzzRd/2ByNBCwC9/9DTYjmGTZeP3HxQ8jSvwDdHq8k3epwght1y86gycOjB/Y
 hPw+89Cq9WI4K4rHBZm8dMGfsNCtFfrKiH8ox7IDnG2rz6Z3rRSUPSoAeHyrugReRBgn
 5TMLP/wYwnZ7uAVdrhfjB9omKIsQc4OYgVYh42uLXocnbas1x/XDqJkb2EG2UICggHXD
 tPyQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=nAVFOQWcbTu+yqKVnimtCnDzszCU3eLkepCRJBaTvzI=;
 b=JOCjtLRvGRNo23mq5CBN3stLsy/VyXyYotlfoO0fjE+xcLRRc6NnWGv5/5eTyQfwLF
 x9L60Nxk15jYkuIk8iVHbfeVal3Tz/pNZ2FRs+OUiFtNM5m+BumUbHUfXnjF6X9AsEBd
 2hDH56seClXThKeJZENRhNU6KnfVaAhapsSo08VmwnnywclYEnWlLdnodV2jzz57pgzK
 3VtskD/5xJ63vW98k8A2LCOJaTtAQQnfGVM8h7ZAWRhT6m6y1hwl5Cxsd0+PpjvTvaHx
 vCukezPEvB6vmJ1yrHZhANPy0ZZ8ve0BGfsqsY4wy1Upq5Ppc4hFNgYa9SqS8QPr0LTV
 hvAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJJNTtrfbTtARXFOXRkdf+xlPKa0T8omPDRxdB9ZiFVhZK0ZcLD
 YNd7ZZUl7B5tberr4825HIQuFzSHn+ZwexLVebERWQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYLQ0cIj0nwtGB4AkbNFWaeKrgtZclGGxXuSHjAvNDs6OsYBBEvreHsDVlr8Fv4FA+dIirW+P/b2sSavRlFWks=
X-Received: by 10.202.104.218 with SMTP id o87mr22221730oik.169.1512969534081; 
 Sun, 10 Dec 2017 21:18:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.58.37 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 21:18:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CANc6esgowty4nEYGqXAP-yDmdB+jvKdrYcHhaYhQkdOE84er8A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANc6esgowty4nEYGqXAP-yDmdB+jvKdrYcHhaYhQkdOE84er8A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tetsuro Nakamura <tnakamura.dpdk@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:18:53 +0900
Message-ID: <CANc6esgQrrLQyFFz-v2tEzqV0yiPf5JmRNPrpR2ic1XDhkVB6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org, nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Fwd: document for rte_flow
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 05:18:55 -0000

Hi all,

Thanks to the document Zhao Wei-san sent to me the other day,
(attached word file), I have evaluated the L2 switching performance
with Generic flow API, with "Intel X552 NIC (10G)".
The result is in the attached pptx file.

Now I am very interested in what happens with the performance
with my Intel "XL710 NIC (40G)"  and "Intel XXV710 (25G)".

So my question is that,
are there rte_flow documents for these NICs just as well as ixgbe NICs
document, attached word file?

Thanks in advance,

-- 
Tetsuro Nakamura <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
<nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
NTT Network Service Systems Laboratories
TEL:0422 59 6914(National)/+81 422 59 6914(International)
3-9-11, Midori-Cho Musashino-Shi, Tokyo 180-8585 Japan