From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383E2A0350
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 01:46:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE851DC06;
	Fri, 29 May 2020 01:46:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-vs1-f42.google.com (mail-vs1-f42.google.com
 [209.85.217.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A246B1DBDF
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 01:46:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-vs1-f42.google.com with SMTP id u7so467676vsp.7
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 28 May 2020 16:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=NEN9FSeL5Z7lMW0hEjQ9atSjOE3mIGlWKhG5Pp1zOfI=;
 b=VVrGV6TNPwm1J+b6YRPJqCHhcvuv/wmvxQ+BPJJyNRn/iCS8HBE1hhFG2zThD6RapI
 WH9zt1sDBLO7ZP3eFVPjCVatK7wENcDptxVUvs9UFmT6yR+CTw0lnm1KFtKA36e26D9J
 YpHYw4aYgdcJNloK5S+LJk5CJ651uTBSgFar2LBN4tSxNf9hYANewi5NARhR1Hvm/9yO
 2lw+c1zaGFfNFrXbrIvR//6D9edwd22E//Cr1449eFEaOQ1VZcmUS/ep0j7sAq8pfpqs
 KwZuFC4aqKylaoAIYsxGbu12Y/gUwCqqAA68hySYxB3fdzLzbKiAkEAu/Bj4wUseb7q/
 rEfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=NEN9FSeL5Z7lMW0hEjQ9atSjOE3mIGlWKhG5Pp1zOfI=;
 b=eL9uhQ15OSlAM3cZnwLtjqb/kRTCuydYYDPQFmYDoPXHvrParZTjb7LGyrjK7wh18t
 8u/otjw3k1v7JtrKLcFp8TbJOYYuDFrwg2D5UZiA8Uh5jBAv0LhCB9P/Aw/jgzulFwv7
 91wqS10PTgkvCHrskvOqqdI4folpKjy9vk0EeS/z+aP8manycRB0+sshJp6GY1qnnj+s
 8yePwK6fabM9xWRjAS5mRd7wnilfzcQb3ZXGzMNgCqufMsqAj+NiwckhLSNuHVz1YFle
 baJGx7p4vafK5E2mxapU8K42jXT/QwDbUWKbp+7WFZ5ycyGAYltkkbfg+CXMdxYnHoUn
 Gw3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Si0Le99kI0vAf5sPvsUQi69Jv10RSXUBwEIf7enHphczmqr46
 MZOrM/BEKutPRavlIZOgLYgxrEwssppGKVIF2szdi/o3
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxd+QPsUQGg2eC0qAfDHnofMQ8nyd68ei9IUBl4SjzUYa0Dd0fXIzFPhrcJeisCbMPYaesnam14L67cSch9+lM=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:e014:: with SMTP id c20mr3989411vsl.81.1590709609882; 
 Thu, 28 May 2020 16:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Archit Pandey <architpandeynitk@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 05:16:37 +0530
Message-ID: <CANtWViMBNEhjXMKe1W0xd273uPgSu-Ub3jcygY4jQOdcPph2Zw@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] AQMs in DPDK
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "users" <users-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hello DPDK Community,

Currently DPDK provides RED for congestion control/queue
management/dropping as part of the QoS Sched framework. Are there plans to
provide support for more AQMs? If there are no plans as of now, would it be
a good idea to include them in the future?

Also what would be the drawbacks of having extended support for AQMs?

--
Archit Pandey
Senior Year Undergraduate Student
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
National Institute of Technology Karnataka
Surathkal, India