From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C97A052B for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:37:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E45C1BFE7; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:37:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ua1-f43.google.com (mail-ua1-f43.google.com [209.85.222.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7FF1023; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:37:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ua1-f43.google.com with SMTP id x19so1812807uap.11; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:37:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7hyh79vWvJN4YopChMeCUvcycIRKJIn3yCl2yCL6Cc4=; b=Ofc7vuJhRyU/YQbSlx6P19WuGf7nPNe3GTco3tyZJiXPvZNXLvZGkAHCTHPifgRvTb BcnnxuGRMNdvCwncVbBkBcCE0LD2k2KkxSUeOO22D5qHMIe0YEQ02FwQOn8Y6bO87BVA MRHrSuscH2JcyXbXSB/Sr6r8sdl/mue10ulv1MYfUfK5AK2JDbEiHRxlitcHsJNbumcu TkmZ9TSw15MGFxEVeS/Tz0o4KtjtrhT3W3eTBIhAxzH2LAg9v8k1gOgPI7QcBw8x42xs M2HgzNv2u8CHby2VwrD/Oz4OW3aOboEoucccpTYos7VGgUj8Gj64ucyyUDG90an72b5h uD3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7hyh79vWvJN4YopChMeCUvcycIRKJIn3yCl2yCL6Cc4=; b=r+BHi9cIFekUnsAnRNXxzvYmr5DM8ur4aa/TwCtVjVOL5P9HKOCQxnb1Z25rUInoKS MOGUtEuoEzeR810uMQpM/sdt8KRmSJRsOkgEtKrzL+2/hYSIR91hfC8SnjLhHUqaBZTz GTWVfvxU8yxrns/ov/S092J6cYgQGvtmZPLb+hn4I9aMFvq9tk4TjRMYFkUjUjQFPUiy s8DfZszYdYCcgw/VnRtq4i9gzdYeH69ED5BGHBTBbPppgreLn6KBjVSQw4zhIdKY0rae sYWKoaftZuBVeMNeL4sE+fioHD3ftRzf/3nDMOKVAMhslQsbtx1HeRJcHS+1xeHj0erE C2fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532H34LY1bF0aRh9B+ElQop0mMiYiiQKI2IQ5iBSXrGiLq4xlxpx 0GT4CPBvJZ/D1Q+IkIzFGI0Kv24nHJuHWRSJXPk6jLSGg0mMXg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJweZ8mpv2jl20p24+1BhvEvw7CrB54qyF/FtJBlb/7RZASeOI1qcb2Byu1nTISABgtm56zsmgL7MqQZTlHPxPk= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:44e5:: with SMTP id n92mr25694879uan.121.1596047860882; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:37:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Archit Pandey Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:07:29 +0530 Message-ID: To: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org Cc: Gokul Bargaje , "Mohit P. Tahiliani" , Tarun Anand , Sanjana Krishnam , "Avinash ." , Leslie Monis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [dpdk-users] Queue Management Support in DPDK X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hello everyone, We have been using DPDK's QoS framework over the last year and found that rte_sched and the provided qos_sched app work great for QoS. However, when we ventured into trying to add CoDel (to replace RED) as a dropper to the framework, we faced several challenges due to how tightly rte_sched and rte_red were coupled together. As we had no success with rte_sched, we would like to propose a new framework for queue management in DPDK. Goals we have in mind for the framework: - Act as an abstraction for queue management algorithms (AQMs) such as CoDel, PiE and RED. - Make it easy for new algorithms to be added. We=E2=80=99d appreciate feedback on whether such a framework would be welco= med in the community, or what else could be done for adding queue management support. Sincerely, Archit Pandey.