From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A456CA0032 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 10:41:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AA440A87; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 10:41:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oo1-f44.google.com (mail-oo1-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACC540A82 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 10:41:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oo1-f44.google.com with SMTP id v33-20020a4a9764000000b0035f814bb06eso344276ooi.11 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 01:41:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OoqsyjOEFhdZuQe71W2S9lHbiiT9yQWv5z02kpaZl+o=; b=KLhqjN9W3tKCdfTf8vDoHMRV8dwk5g/YEugmsOEGW8e44Hy/hp6zCcFtTO+9XMrmHl rGOFkeOjiPY1810WIqt6yBwZLq4wB0cGEuLAdUAyHoVXWMPRlCMt6IvVzXMz7va9JmqT W4/qhjqy3X39B06vmPINWhwZDjMNrSdiQ0aTZNzZwbeqYoI2P+slnsU3o/gsLesWz2N0 D30tw3bCPOr08zSGuedUN1HycdwUFr07+ErKzib82zX1uA7KenohAQy7PLJrzPB08ZVV 7d2T67i/7sFi1z//1l/kKVtv6WvlIPz8mi9BVuVzsZLaYbJUBkH5pP1vF73h8d7wyP1G Ocpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OoqsyjOEFhdZuQe71W2S9lHbiiT9yQWv5z02kpaZl+o=; b=knUxJ1w8MUZuGujwwD/3x4tOsQO+MmiPJVcnyXG8XYimJvFXutWFClNszgjOwqqz5q SkKC9M0+WJGIPE4PhB6lcbbTWzToVNF3y3njE1BuzWRRXSQZnRunnyFsZBBX5zw6PLqt bI8Bs6ao93yHPrZvqzj36aNqYX3h3PTBwEwQzgiBB3xo/boU8iS+Qd/VbNegeLEvFOOE onMZ0btUwomSyxfZ8UjfqAwRU/W4xHinxv85DHKyRKdPf3bmDm/kqA8/g1jM1oHXsnKx FgjyTg/2nrPGkFINnRpdgYg7W2UiP4IMISMyUvExGbRo0242Z47g597brPWmCULPgqEI vUJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8EwQlt6+Spdp08i4y3eHDgC8sLhpWW0ClAlaKt+YaOIwIEjUZ/ yH9B4PmAJDllhidywxLasN2EmfmwjL1jjbGSBlvEUOch7TxknQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1szyOQ9cpA5A6SjGADN+Zdv9Xb+cZuYTpwPQ49lolj8ijxceWvF3ruIZL176Np+gUyVoGMk9JwgNl6CZxfApAk= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:978d:0:b0:425:78aa:f546 with SMTP id w13-20020a4a978d000000b0042578aaf546mr1910564ooi.1.1656060084240; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 01:41:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Antonio Di Bacco Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 10:41:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Large VF not supported on most of my Intel cards To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org I have several different Intel ethernet cards. On each one I try the following steps: 1) Enable 4 SRIOVs on one port 2) Bind the first VF with DPDK (sudo dpdk-devbind.py --bind vfio-pci 0000:xx:yy:z) 3) Launch a DPDK application that uses the VF and then calls: rte_eth_dev_configure(port, 0, /* nb rx queue */ 64, /* nb tx queue */ ðconf) < 0); rte_eth_dev_set_mtu(port, 9600); for (i = 0; i < NB_TX_QUEUES; i++) rte_eth_tx_queue_setup(port, i, 4096, /* queue size */ cpus->numacore, &txconf); I always get a "Large VF not supported error" for these cards: * XXV710 for 25GbE SFP28 (firmware-version: 8.70 0x8000c3eb 1.3179.0) * X710/X557-AT 10GBASE-T but these cards ARE working fine: * 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ * E810-C for QSFP Consider I installed latest intel drivers on my LInux box: * i40e-2.19.3 * iavf-4.4.2.1 * ice-1.8.9 Best regards