From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39044290B for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 16:48:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3434440DDC; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 16:48:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ej1-f46.google.com (mail-ej1-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF08740A81 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 16:48:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ej1-f46.google.com with SMTP id sh8so12975298ejc.10 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 07:48:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1681138105; x=1683730105; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wNT9EU5mabjKN76EzXzJyYgGIFRB7Bz4bE0eOQnhS6U=; b=Kv8jV/e8I1cRr8e8VgiK27zxhAhepZT+ZShNhwZLlp9SWvYW+hY47EY4mUrI2LaJoe w2FrKP5QSZOfWvMOYrq3Yd7MS59bY+xiWQaUmUk59xTJez/AB9hGa/pUj8yNFQoS8BCm +SksI1xWR8mGaBiTX9M+O52unBk28SWCOfZLLmA9BeHM95Myi75jo6n1Fq8RkcvgXFxP J3STxH7uIe2pIkufMXxgzY1R98zQAIj5/kDC3J59PI8+MPZKUfZldXFRf9KLhlUhYS6B eGtb5GFI62Z9j1ijYSWkKwT7s8XbtlafxHRNxoxbt8Ez1CnWkbjWnTCMoHlUSqOXzA0z 1bLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681138105; x=1683730105; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wNT9EU5mabjKN76EzXzJyYgGIFRB7Bz4bE0eOQnhS6U=; b=Kf+VwCsDClsoFsFeyuNWg42lQV1I6V2nR6RAVZSwoIBhkuixls7xKD/vcYrvucavmE xwnM1oDtMknrvoj7Ih7TEtLEfjOpRcv2pKI7PotkmdERvjz0xjKUexmEIZMJYb1Bp3i7 KATEJUc7HIdDVDagQ6vU+SbEQXFxG/bogLFmPDo99/Sq0xMs/xXXzd/xJmcyRp9yf9en IU8ZmVhyXmaqNrGZIs5jxG/7sjFFA9qNS4Mg+QL1D/0YgfIYsWpTsEnSo6QKLhSr3q72 29yOFEqO9ihX9B0ciRZcWr3++JIgR34LigomqEMooC3W4xC9XvbhXbC7yVfjnYxjrxIf olew== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9dSZ/CUzrOWc6PMrebys+bSKCzvmZuN3qvCIJq1Yr95DbjfUuG/ I4Q3Vqg6WKDoKz8iCG7EwMSFGf2s/uxm9f8aac/T6GIoxC2DZw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350au6NTeRvpWS/W20NHYQzEhNM/muTLRTwuH9FT2/YSFqPWcjc+98J1lpp4YAFhZNAfUYyJ5JsLoAnyUrurbgCM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:350b:b0:94a:8dd4:9547 with SMTP id r11-20020a170906350b00b0094a8dd49547mr1310482eja.8.1681138105046; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 07:48:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Antonio Di Bacco Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 16:48:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Measuring core frequency with dpdk To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Is it possible to measure the core frequency using a DPDK api? Not the maximum or nominal frequency but the actual number of instruction cycles per second. Best regards, Anna