From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E2AA2EDB for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:53:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0D91BED3; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:53:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f170.google.com (mail-qk1-f170.google.com [209.85.222.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91BF1BECE for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:52:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f170.google.com with SMTP id w2so8229528qkf.2 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:52:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1r8bv0MZ8Tz0o+iDmJgFJgc6uTgevuK7DRShAfLuMG8=; b=TwmhXSuSOJLAeg0FWvzH7nz6PchIZrTlxj5dGZvplXfRasjVbL7aVQfsuxWwULsNPO GFKKS4j1S8DbZNVERMJBPvfd5Jv9NgecoLLjqd1zV/N8y58W/fj18pOvjAiR2KNcx5ep R+5ic+JVjZoyPVJ3fhzcBvGOA2DPwVO1iBi8LzIzMoY4j7Xnx0cukea5hX2vo5iSmHIc PbMqq7S4TVIO0jMLQwPbaMagd7puRJN16m7L945e3WNMbI209/4oJOcm1DekzEJOz7XA P96m+jTDkJHmdporFATE69IvPWd2GcooKOuYiHxsscPle8g/0v5+RJdhHPU4XlB0voog fMEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1r8bv0MZ8Tz0o+iDmJgFJgc6uTgevuK7DRShAfLuMG8=; b=hsEDbeyRmpVlpnt81kEZA1iZZAsSx2BDOsZS/QwBNXuxWA8lOpJfgmQ9d2MysHMEZD rrsoNEMH+QaNVXsKSpO1Y/Ev4Xju2BLqlXnxbYO26mXAiCBiAFy9A25RPk1tqKxNPG+9 oaB8VrhlEDA7P6/rIfu7aPDlvsdzwVjCesdpDa8UQzjtL+rFLzpIDMeDIVjCYyOlpC70 H8G104UI7xeo1hJnXmMgX6VnTB+jNWSviNHWBGwLcdQ/ZH5LLJe2wjef4qlwNDBzQvJQ 38OKwfjUs1u4fcwDwCraweLbhTWG8XNQQ4vEVjM4hJi3vvD1oS5GSeyAAk2ekvdMqIhF giGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUeAeeigf6ee8NNa4uUrzxjDtbaR7AWV05sP881c+GvBl/4yL/N 2ZPdzHV2UyQ3gYM7LhM5N5HuShikoacIUNgjjQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx8DcdwQqyi4wmvemoGYYNyP1BuOsGVAx2DspKpf2k6SRckWvTbiIXWlrV+zKm26Y5RUJfJlqKicIitWE/hSXw= X-Received: by 2002:a37:a409:: with SMTP id n9mr640049qke.485.1569858777888; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:52:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Laurent Dumont Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:52:45 -0400 Message-ID: To: "David Harton (dharton)" Cc: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] net/i40e VF state does not track PF state X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hey David, >From the compute, can you check if the VF "link-state" status is set to "auto"? That parameter is required for the physical state of the PF to be reflected by the VF. Thanks On Mon, Sep 30, 2019, 11:12 AM David Harton (dharton) wrote: > I'm using i40evf based interfaces using DPDK 18.11. > > The host is rhel 7.3 and the PF driver details are: > ethtool -i enp9s0f1 > driver: i40e > version: 1.5.10-k > firmware-version: 6.01 0x800036b8 0.385.33 > expansion-rom-version: > bus-info: 0000:09:00.1 > supports-statistics: yes > supports-test: yes > supports-eeprom-access: yes > supports-register-dump: yes > supports-priv-flags: yes > > When the PF is shut the VFs are not showing a 'down' state. > > Is this a known issue? Any tips on how to debug? > > Thanks, > Dave > >