From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f182.google.com (mail-qk0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB591C81F for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 05:27:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk0-f182.google.com with SMTP id j73so5640070qke.6 for ; Sat, 07 Apr 2018 20:27:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/mb+RDURmb2wzJ8Ia0axtanJzRvGI78SVYLo0jIQEJE=; b=bE4McZle1Uv088pYANiy5QP0cuzNA4FCamK8ij3rnuPk9ossy7Axic1HIE00RrP5f7 5Hzh4RRbAjwnqWLNrC1jPkGme8w1pgicyOvfJMpcTfF9I2IerGU9roLF+cEOr7Ls9IOR rfcTZIE36E7S9kCUiggfm/gNTObjSjGzpdOtZz+ahgT9nPeIcjkHL4Ca3uBsAmKmp50E oPg6U2t8sFDqXvvy10RIwAvSNm7tTGBaJ0v0gsAB5MVgxkPJXqrXb61WU4GBaU0u60dv AIyOlw2QsZgsbTjHddHdU8GWAPeWOoEAbh9dFV7HOW169Sxx7irT/xNbJE5NR2Z1b3B6 zlDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=/mb+RDURmb2wzJ8Ia0axtanJzRvGI78SVYLo0jIQEJE=; b=a4Q856QJCPo1LkQrIEadITsmpoGCW44EBrVUQB16vKmfiHiXZgmRxpuAabPsb1Q9/l rk75xPGVtJyCe29HuGsEQmYU7J9gNw0s7xc1AkWD9dMeHxGPormdpm6WT40OCp5aeA0g 2xx1fMaJDKHdTbKkPyt81jsGMX+1Fcnn1xzs7FrntWl7p/PytDdGsJ0Ey1tcCeVjp0Sj 2DdwLj/X+pOqxeBz8IO+tcu1TkXxX87zlCLz9cnF3/Mr+Eg1WKnVx4uXcm3dlgdSJn9K b6cPoSTFQkW7hPmKA9nD/jcQzRFY5pEB+xNDr07xzCbn3ogiBGiYOtEdJdx+b+NISOCh SWvA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDvpoIm6DFF76nLOXlO/ASlZWCZjxBVsjiB7CxeEXNT5k/Ymts9 6UyfHaI+4QnSQ5KVdVLScv4Ei1a8Lp/XNrwogmk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48cwbnwvs1biOjNQnB67/NKL5nZsCv3FXtTng7mOtVTTthv5be8+nrQ05y4VxlgZBn21ZiQEwBeiOCwUgNne0s= X-Received: by 10.55.64.22 with SMTP id n22mr43183341qka.186.1523158049463; Sat, 07 Apr 2018 20:27:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.214.149 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 20:27:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sam Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 11:27:29 +0800 Message-ID: To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Bugs while using valgrind to check OVS-DPDK X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 03:27:30 -0000 Or this question could be: How could we check memory leak in OVS-DPDK? 2018-04-08 11:05 GMT+08:00 Sam : > Hi all, > > I'm using valgrind to check OVS-DPDK memleak, I could run OVS-DPDK, but > vf/pf port in OVS-DPDK could not link up and could not send packets. > > As OVS-DPDK use UIO mode and shared memory, and valgrind have logical > core. Will these make OVS-DPDK can't work? > > Is there someone running OVS-DPDK under valgrind, could share to me? > > Thank you~ >