From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <batmanustc@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qt0-f171.google.com (mail-qt0-f171.google.com
 [209.85.216.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC991BD37
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun,  8 Apr 2018 05:05:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-qt0-f171.google.com with SMTP id v11so5529294qtj.6
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sat, 07 Apr 2018 20:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=ckuZchJJ9rsjCJchjg+7M/LOaMQ8n9+HyOtIeE47JFQ=;
 b=X3V99eIkEeU0Rsns9qWRA2n8wenbrLCubMNIYshlwW3pEYw2vjLCaWfuVh8en2Syjb
 utC5rh1YLNJU1mtbs0WJD2g3VARd55COGO3DQr/0sG1A22taG9SyOwq/R/vNFsv9x7Bd
 A+8COVISi8Ccl2cmwE/7ZzRmg2GVFoYm7w+PQ2j46WdtCsl/sm1OXkVwzQQoGje9BBpU
 tGgr234H4Y2b7pLTxdT8mKMMiCKb77jwhr/5U7NGfsAcIuPvi7dg6zegZixFJN98eMko
 mteoxEDTng1WOBxuAFjhMooHWClPo2BUSgtflmxvnmLgcJLaCcOJir/9dJAOZu2sfChc
 CnGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=ckuZchJJ9rsjCJchjg+7M/LOaMQ8n9+HyOtIeE47JFQ=;
 b=pse0ECDY9F2+yo7EKcpW16TfWvaFwiLhEqWYApyRcsoD3g51p349vyNI4X1kp99k0S
 ONRtnnXZ8FvkplD/J+zQ/VjPem4akCbQm/AdMEL6IItnaBxweY2f4Cics7sr/pQv27TZ
 rKhIRyTO7H6/e7//U1xhQEoeH0+NesmlrQQnAAH5EpFZc9hUJGlitT+juridD6t2zI0L
 EUIpKMzkqes8Zpz1AncW95niZ0ZXqRZoj49PJPTDJVvLmHUviRuMuADWfdwClwqy9g79
 dW+IjRIJYdhr5ZPRDm5ZeaX7BPQIHvJCXLUv5BXc+BFZTRpkRgzEWGvN2p7JLR+fed7+
 UHzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCnxahwZvt1idjTeu2GVjce6ZP6BAkKfxVgQYFQr5XV+Z1U++lu
 mfxN1n0MxDIc7C7+z4ih4j7u/GjhRj0cYO8BflY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+58atWVcWQ1V+iJwUw1S0aC9qIJaafxqaPP9d6RM5PSjG2JPV6qc0OiU2Pfkc4HvokgCGbMbV1ZuOh6FrcpYk=
X-Received: by 10.237.61.213 with SMTP id j21mr44813769qtf.251.1523156731558; 
 Sat, 07 Apr 2018 20:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.214.149 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 20:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sam <batmanustc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 11:05:30 +0800
Message-ID: <CAOE=1Z3Cw6YkkbmSAkvff+tuXjf0qPJUY99+EqHE1awZocEtMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Bugs while using valgrind to check OVS-DPDK
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 03:05:32 -0000

Hi all,

I'm using valgrind to check OVS-DPDK memleak, I could run OVS-DPDK, but
vf/pf port in OVS-DPDK could not link up and could not send packets.

As OVS-DPDK use UIO mode and shared memory, and valgrind have logical core.
Will these make OVS-DPDK can't work?

Is there someone running OVS-DPDK under valgrind, could share to me?

Thank you~