From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <anand.sa88@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com (mail-qk0-f177.google.com
 [209.85.220.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381832629
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 06:59:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-qk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id t2so49705420qkc.1
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 21:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=A58CYV4GB08LvB92kISD6145ct1AA+VEiXc7lApZe0Q=;
 b=ne1bS3aUywy/1lTSFXFT9rZjr+teUgQ5kvvOyYgGDTePCWgUgdaIfXr4rFdmcQy5Xq
 hl0KOekK2fUxM/ahywl9vqwc94hEt4fCQZ/7yeDnQjrLImmZCfuOcp6/ho24nHiP95AC
 6I+ik7u10++Zqa3jM1FXIxbRGgCAaS+Mzw260dU8eJ4SOmxmdvJ3U+I+0QxNTemRCAs8
 3GdlqFhGoWt5sHAOJx92NUSe6DopJut3cYsIn4zOAul+FKS6FcY9B+wQOsU4aTdTH0nm
 C1VN1a+SziAjB+z+uRtibE+bwi1ur5vJEsypE+YbrjbJPkTojI7x738PfcELmNn3KqJH
 IMyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=A58CYV4GB08LvB92kISD6145ct1AA+VEiXc7lApZe0Q=;
 b=HSG7nrW3KK55iPflUq4a8HQ0pqwk0Ebo6lUbR5SvN9KFfmYQif7hEkcX+/WHsT8xQ5
 m/U16N7K8wSg8Dq2U0mfF7qCFiQM8q/RcDMB6eKALaqBSsh2MCxAoIVScT7EKZH4ZWxH
 18DNqtSOPKOc+YtuGKa4M9QD+kTSRP9GrECyylH6wWM3s26c3NZfrkZr9YGtCCvbYvyS
 DYEtmO+EzfYKHDDtJMXeshlnCN878znvGQlIgj+BZR+GFkYm5Om9hsmBhNBqvNrj0wb4
 +1ax7+6h1zbPLhLOISNA2whVQOJjiuWEkg6N69bEnQuS5ZzoRbkWennfZqagp7Ix0eka
 u9Cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111+/jREjKTGoiRL16pBJSgoHx+rtmCvSDdvJCRK0l28Z0aufutK
 lgRjCDoq0wKAA5vUSkE7d61DAk2vqQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.72.206 with SMTP id v197mr18272667qka.133.1500872367925; 
 Sun, 23 Jul 2017 21:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.3.129 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 21:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOP5GAxQvVrj8F6rp8WuNGy83e85SBFhCKgyWxUYcjvUxD-e_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOP5GAxQvVrj8F6rp8WuNGy83e85SBFhCKgyWxUYcjvUxD-e_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: SAKTHIVEL ANAND S <anand.sa88@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:29:27 +0530
Message-ID: <CAOP5GAy=sYgG8pWXEqAwyJf2pBeSekWDmNPZesfdkPigFQTjjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] query: NIC firmware upgrade
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 04:59:29 -0000

Hi , any one came across above mentioned scenario, if so please let me know
what kind of impact it will create in older version on dpdk app(after
upgrading nic firmware).Thanks.

-Sakthivel S OM

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:50 PM, SAKTHIVEL ANAND S <anand.sa88@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi
> I am having 2 VMs on my host. VM1 is running my application with dpdk2.2.0
> without any issues and i am using VM2 for dpdk17.05 for the same
> application. But newer version of dpdk (dpdk 17.05 ) needs NIC's firmware
> upgrade for SR-IOV Nics.
>
> If i upgrade firmware, will it create any trouble for VM1(which is running
> without any issues) or firmware upgrade will have the backward
> compatibility?
>
> NIC: Physical nic Intel  X710/XL710 10GbE SFP+
>         current version:1.3.45
>         latest version:1.4.28
> Host:VMware 5.5.0 and
>
> Please let me know what all the things i have to consider before going for
> NIC firmware upgrade.
>
> --
> Thanks
> Sakthivel S OM
>
>


-- 
Thanks
Sakthivel S OM