From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <log0div0@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf0-f53.google.com (mail-lf0-f53.google.com
 [209.85.215.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A2E5A62
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 16 May 2016 17:39:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf0-f53.google.com with SMTP id u64so118682043lff.3
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 16 May 2016 08:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
 bh=GhPfGXLy5wkTY+LlAa+IecIAGmmSmd1bONbB5r7b1ZY=;
 b=oXnj2vY7mqpwDQxrXMKyZF0Uyh2RG6wTH5pj6QVcpFcQrD9baQCCrp3qqfiafwTeCG
 30iT+oqqKXCZ0l9X8eo7qBIAOVEilVe1xRlvW5rFQ0RXbc298svXGMhIXiBY9AID/Faf
 MVjq4rxEBfwpOtGMyf8oUa7GJQXYxvYh+0Nn3cZpdr+9fzoyQtc0yyF3YI4C0d6FbtMj
 IGHOCfBdLPPdPkE30tP9PtoZNMoOgqXorhxikOURQxtAiCVgz/6MfS2xt2LpWl3WACIA
 BYd5d6lBeMosZ9G89BqtjpC+g2AhXZC7ieB7SWiwosmHGmUNkn/f5v0bgC6IPKqCgRsf
 oSAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
 bh=GhPfGXLy5wkTY+LlAa+IecIAGmmSmd1bONbB5r7b1ZY=;
 b=IqMcknRqUHVcfGG1/a4bI194ts1GVueHe94LebwE+1tH7ikG9YRY9daVtEP8vGQAv/
 +1nlZXFd2a0sgkL0z3jctEpWNsjpt4DUd/oWoXqPFmd4Xn0aeXGeBgglrla0QMCyJDiL
 CrYx5YrrlfvF5I55bfQ84QAVbVxNABzc0GnelViVqZfJky+YX1cNVyOodbsCDSV4O2La
 KPOJT4dLVPDD+gkvf1qKMTVUQNIyPJOAUpwTNmd+YAj6G/8J2tO4ii9N02hmvvamwHn0
 okIr3opnn/97S9+pH4atx7e0SHQNxmRL/uMaYNELk8g2H3gUPtFo++jN8oeimIX5tdc7
 QKhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUr4X4E8M2BrCVA6Dq4wyg/TBbenEK3VzBaw3byPWLJmLvyIjUYQgGyezGbJfdvyP8AiFtPcszfKJk99g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.39.73 with SMTP id n70mr12054521lfn.91.1463413153106;
 Mon, 16 May 2016 08:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.59.79 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2016 08:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 18:39:13 +0300
Message-ID: <CAORPgtAWjmqYrtWP53_+pJUKhNrRc+PmV993FhQiGKooJiErww@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?0KHQtdGA0LPQtdC5INCb0YzQstC+0LI=?= <log0div0@gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Cann't achieve the linerate troughput when the packet
	size is 64 bytes
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 15:39:13 -0000

Hi

I have Intel 82599EB with 2x10Gb ports.
With payload on one port throughput is ~9500Mbit/s for read and ~9500Mbit/s
for write.
With payload on two ports throughput is ~7000Mbit/s for read (on both
ports) and ~9300Mbit/s for write (on both ports).
I'm sure that the CPU cores socket id is the same as NIC socket id and that
CPU is not a bottleneck. Suppose that bottleneck is NIC or PCI (I'm using
PCIe x8). Can you tell me please, is it the maximum troughput that
available for my NIC?

Thanks