From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <abutter.gao@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf0-f67.google.com (mail-lf0-f67.google.com
 [209.85.215.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968CD568D
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue,  6 Sep 2016 01:55:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf0-f67.google.com with SMTP id j41so1786538lfi.3
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 16:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=REEkiQXOdK8YqAib7A2OAgCmuUZjSZXZ1QxDtmwyZmE=;
 b=DrhwaAOrSFtgMCwBcwYD5gVmEGqIyYHmnTrUU4rQ8+xxNf2hqhgLQVj0Lm5G7FoIoE
 pmJZCZH4w/hySEFDNvK1NAjKg7lXS/Bly4Yhdt/Ql7mU7mweZdfoDHHbOypK8R4U0gF4
 Z+fNJpu6+kPFoXMu4D44ZtowLnM1lDmf+2OLcDVXNB+Yal2MWpFeVCvewN1MI057cTAV
 h2dqPAYDhPoIXx/oev+j1nYBxgjEl6IKch6j9ejBTE9MSHAgOL8tn0Sdh3RZwU49pfGD
 lF2BogetmeZDcOtBSYZepjaeeOoXKnCgf7QXrEUcCdS0+eZocWL7K1cDDYGxWVWEqATY
 tCfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=REEkiQXOdK8YqAib7A2OAgCmuUZjSZXZ1QxDtmwyZmE=;
 b=FxPm97sHr7AxU0gcTHy2wpFQqNC7mwdtQ6nh9eN2wYjZaRrjg9d8vXlQa9YxKNC2Vt
 qxms8sKaUIjqiFXStzzVvp/wnguEsPR8q7CBR2fSc9xjtrBNWFSlv4PRmst5VH+UFPEB
 +TagTm4RfbF5jeTfx4fvFvAo+RMw7QrV0qOOvvELHZx0cj3o88LmXaR6R79ROPY67cJB
 JRZ9QFwO3EoSPo1+Ye5AScnMrf0Rpev1u7jHca9GXim2fMaliCKBPcaL7VP04o5KSbK5
 z3lS/aEWOXuo7CqIJVFWVDafi6EX1nX9TH99HTb5yzuNNDRGN6rCNoe82VzcyoxqFcXw
 vDlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMbHwc0a64dpAsVvjdv59KnWSBG0Cak7Vx7sdeoeLY0Oh6rQK8gHYeZPXd87+Yy2pDJSsn76FrVXNIBNw==
X-Received: by 10.25.216.214 with SMTP id r83mr1383007lfi.59.1473119756069;
 Mon, 05 Sep 2016 16:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.42.132 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 16:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1847119.8aDmHCeqkf@xps13>
References: <CAOTokwfa3vDPymUpQjnQYSxgfOXRYcn=LZqrF4sD2eVohaSGrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1847119.8aDmHCeqkf@xps13>
From: "Gao Ya'nan" <abutter.gao@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 07:55:55 +0800
Message-ID: <CAOTokwfNW1bCDHnpQo_zCSJz=_hf=eqTp92nHcB_axkGy_18SQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Does DPDK support big endian system?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 23:55:57 -0000

Hi Thomas,

Got it.I would try to debug first to see why it failed.

Thanks for your comments.

Yanan

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
wrote:

> 2016-09-05 11:49, Gao Ya'nan:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am trying porting librte_acl to a platform with Cavium MIPS64
> processor.
> > I tried the a set of rules and a trace file on x86 Linux first and then
> run
> > testacl on this platform with same rules and trace file, but didn't see
> any
> > right result.
> >
> > Any suggestion would be appreciate.
>
> Some DPDK areas try to manage endianness right but it's not tested and
> I would not be surprised that ACL would need some fixes for big endian.
>