From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f47.google.com (mail-pg0-f47.google.com [74.125.83.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910F82C36 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:30:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id b11so2611038pgn.12 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 04:30:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=be99/twjl6RV3ksK0Oz7J7D5IfqNXJxY+b4uAO+74A0=; b=ZREjeeuxcNVZdYpiqm0dLBGK1PGkQYXx5KVtpTCw0aN1pukJk3Xf9E8hXZEIhwnsU6 o4ZsyBjS8JEzwEixmcLN1ZoDirXep6l4/75qKEjzb6JpWiZSecvbGYSrjhnnHf/gpVpr B07S9E9hlqE0yU0/OPGYMXEJre20c6g5VAy8Wb3s3Yzer2cTnm4ihKI2+rQwMPj6BErv qPhqth+HGJX0p44eINZMln2kgHnPHdh25D96WC30jTwLmOHQwMZi0Cju/tRkBjPwMRY5 KCJafWuKGq+Fppoa+XRn0UWKG+ItS8gngyeB57AdT9dDE6cC8sw+2Q+wu1HC1zlPKd1o FOMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=be99/twjl6RV3ksK0Oz7J7D5IfqNXJxY+b4uAO+74A0=; b=WtWMQcka/R5LBy8BabLhBjLkdF4TP0nui44KruUo035JUW+y5B0O0+HGCAX3rz1V3X 9O+1pUJzWcWzTm7wlG9h4HREQKJomCZ3donyhii3IX6ObN1SXP1/Bo/woLgGwXFuOfkc E0ejxVInWPxVky8LicPTjVHdnNuDtIF78tl5Zl99XU/EQRKxAx54XlYrEXAGepbhuMQQ Bgxu8vojMyP1nJ7O7Ls1KHiMGlTqMVR/1ACX/s7hYpFTV5VWu3G7y7cw7/l6eTznfqVF sC3C2POXTxeovsp0BNFIAG3gEosveDexNzS7W3MIOqcfpO+VG/JQBxa10Dq9MK+5p1O3 I6KQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhxvuV3Gb1MG7FIZBRHw0qqAWhUw+84Ur8wjVruIbeGIcZ82y8k aHlsNI7tbw7RpT1w05ZlZVslqKatN2VRkAyGDtho0rE5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBx7WzRwFzeofUXhpltV1thjDuce9VVdBOnicGa1go7BNXoY4lkNdasKAC4Z4wRscPhyh0M9Vjk3tjnvhDU1Cc= X-Received: by 10.101.77.137 with SMTP id p9mr4587875pgq.88.1506252600748; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 04:30:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.178.77 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 04:29:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.178.77 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 04:29:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 04:29:59 -0700 Message-ID: To: Matt Laswell Cc: users Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Safe to rte_exit() during EAL init? X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 11:30:01 -0000 There is no magic inside DPDK library. Read the source and decide. The hugepage startup was a bug in older versions, it should be fixed now. On Sep 22, 2017 8:18 PM, "Matt Laswell" wrote: > Hey Folks, > > In our application, EAL initialization can take a very long time due to a > large amount of huge page memory. Under some circumstances such as > software updates, we would like to cut that process off early. Is it OK to > call rte_exit() while rte_eal_init() is still running? > > Thanks. > > -- > Matt Laswell > infinite io, inc. >