From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <msmondal@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com
 [209.85.223.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C50111D9
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:54:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id g203so39821iof.2
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 07:54:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=CktCkxmXV9cbHEozpOp6Emt+6vvdJv63vDAm21hvhDM=;
 b=cbot9eMp1S7SpQ7hZ/YRSlFCygMEdVOPbNvPKScBY6fN5H6xww0rRKA+rHO6uENewh
 AvJZjtiJv7zbLLnp98fh3kWlZjcYtbjQQ7ERDEUeFN7Mk+z4tTRRHnrYwTkIsxn0A+lf
 FxY8npHqMn38+wLoXpV6JzWOY8GkW4ltIA2rgJlne2vNQVLy/Ge04pGFKvnDV7Kys05m
 c0SC03JQsDkQQ2vpD+XcjCdxYAaZpw1UPksLUo4Amw5KQGsiP3UwFOARqELR8N0IGdHp
 XOiTeuSYE9KJ5KVV3ceRA8TejKS/BUmA4LiHUpueIB6XBhPCY3o9dUNLkHV+KogBScGG
 Cc9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type;
 bh=CktCkxmXV9cbHEozpOp6Emt+6vvdJv63vDAm21hvhDM=;
 b=h7D2yCdEVrDloiTT/4R0pOkFlR0B/cXW++pIUdhoOPg73llQy8VJV7A1GE+Cb5MMNa
 KNmIzrFa/fzJeUMhD2aRxsbJ05M1oRnlQKTkNfLuOO5gzQFFeYI6MIXW7RF3cWEsVX5C
 i6tYbEW+J0esb5c16KJHKwSciuRvyexx1gj6e8Tj4Ajl4JZDRLDxqOkPbWo3MkZGFeLJ
 thP/3w5vVsKRucZoS3OWPtvsdgtA0M627yzs+OHzvBwWWPzdVEmd2enfNWwiZTrp6z1I
 zptsZxpJdKO/5TkgUh7CS5wYgZC2371eQbpsSDLiv8bFcrVPGSrUsvgJDh4TX3eeh1VH
 /j9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT/JmHgPMMhKODbNVUfstOHQwbi5JdBomOZq/PzqGgHeNzSsJHPp0x+AuyxewxCKnZ0fGQ0NLmbTo1itQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.43.151 with SMTP id r145mr39645990ior.156.1455119669746; 
 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 07:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.107.38.7 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 07:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 21:24:29 +0530
Message-ID: <CAOje91_2FPR9=+TYiYk3JO2fGR-_iB=ERu0Wqn__2YPfNE9xyA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Shahjamal Mondal <msmondal@gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Issue with IGMP query v2
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:54:30 -0000

I have been trying to get ethernet frames having IGMP version 2 query,
using the function rte_eth_rx_burst. But it seems that those frames are
being skipped by DPDK, even though tcpdump is capturing those packets.

Does that mean that DPDK does not handle IGMP? This could be the case as
there are no APIs to handle IGMP unlike protocols such as ICMP or UDP.

NIC: Mellanox ConnectX-3
DPDK version 2.2.0
MLNX OFED version: 3.1-1.1.0.1