DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andriy Berestovskyy <aber@semihalf.com>
To: Renata Saiakhova <Renata.Saiakhova@oneaccess-net.com>
Cc: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>,
	users <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] rte_segments: hugepages are not in contiguous memory
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:13:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOysbxoxT2nqxTmM0yc+evC4ih+aXS7jGV9PJw3e=p3gCvWJpQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57F3787A.6060105@oneaccess-net.com>

Hi Renata,
DPDK supports non-contiguous memory pools, but
rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() uses rte_mempool_create_empty() with flags
set to zero, i.e. requests contiguous memory.

As a workaround, in rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() try to pass
MEMPOOL_F_NO_PHYS_CONTIG flag as the last argument to
rte_mempool_create_empty().

Note that KNI and some PMDs in 16.07 still require contiguous memory
pools, so the trick might not work for your setup. For the KNI try the
DPDK's master branch which includes the commit by Ferruh Yigit:

8451269 kni: remove continuous memory restriction

Regards,
Andriy


On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Renata Saiakhova
<Renata.Saiakhova@oneaccess-net.com> wrote:
> Hi Sergio,
>
> thank you for your quick answer. I also tried to allocate 1GB hugepage, but
> seems kernel fails to allocate it: previously I've seen that HugePages_Total
> in /proc/meminfo is set to 0, now - kernel hangs at boot time (don't know
> why).
> But anyway, if there is no way to control hugepage allocation in the sense
> they are in contiguous memory there is only way to accept it and adapt the
> code that it creates several pools which in total satisfy the requested
> size.
>
> Renata
>
>
> On 10/04/2016 10:27 AM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
>>
>> On 04/10/2016 09:00, Renata Saiakhova wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm using dpdk 16.04 (I tried 16.07 with the same results) and linux
>>> kernel 4.4.20 in a virtual machine (I'm using libvirt framework). I pass a
>>> parameter in kernel command line to allocate 512 hugepages of 2 MB at boot
>>> time. They are successfully allocated. When an application with dpdk starts
>>> it calls rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() which in turns requests internally
>>> 649363712 bytes.  Those bytes should be allocated from one of rte_memseg.
>>> rte_memsegs describes contiguous portions of memory (both physical and
>>> virtual) built on hugepages. This allocation fails, because there are no
>>> rte_memsegs of this size (or bigger). Further debugging shows that hugepages
>>> are allocated in non-contiguous physical memory and therefore rte_memsegs
>>> are built respecting gaps in physical memory.
>>> Below are the sizes of segments built on hugepages (in bytes)
>>> 2097152
>>> 6291456
>>> 2097152
>>> 524288000
>>> 2097152
>>> 532676608
>>> 2097152
>>> 2097152
>>> So there are 5 segments which includes only one hugepage!
>>> This behavior is completely different to what I observe with linux kernel
>>> 3.8 (used with the same application with dpdk) - where all hugepages are
>>> allocated in contiguous memory.
>>> Does anyone experience the same issue? Could it be some kernel option
>>> which can do the magic? If not, and kernel can allocated hugepages in
>>> non-contiguous memory how dpdk is going to resolve it?
>>>
>>
>> I don't think there is anything we can do to force the kernel to
>> pre-allocate contig hugepages on boot. If there was, we wouldn't need to do
>> all this mapping sorting and grouping we do on DPDK
>> as we would rely on the kernel giving us pre-allocated contig hugepages.
>>
>> If you have plenty of memory one possible work around would be to increase
>> the number of default hugepages so we are likely to find more contiguous
>> ones.
>>
>> Is using 1GB hugepages a possibility in your case?
>>
>> Sergio
>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Renata
>>>
>>
>> .
>>
>



-- 
Andriy Berestovskyy

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-04 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-04  8:00 Renata Saiakhova
2016-10-04  8:27 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-10-04  9:38   ` Renata Saiakhova
2016-10-04 10:13     ` Andriy Berestovskyy [this message]
2016-10-04 10:48       ` Renata Saiakhova
2016-10-04 11:27         ` Andriy Berestovskyy
2016-10-04 12:02           ` tom.barbette
2016-10-04 14:09             ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-10-06 11:02               ` tom.barbette

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOysbxoxT2nqxTmM0yc+evC4ih+aXS7jGV9PJw3e=p3gCvWJpQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=aber@semihalf.com \
    --cc=Renata.Saiakhova@oneaccess-net.com \
    --cc=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).