From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lnykww@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vk0-f44.google.com (mail-vk0-f44.google.com
 [209.85.213.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3A6532C
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Wed,  6 Jul 2016 05:37:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-vk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id m127so229946680vkb.3
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 20:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=fZtqbZkZgrEr++OeUHRREcCANRtJR3EwDppMZ+S75tA=;
 b=eohQe9XY8QwYbpu9puEe0HpF0RmZGJe7jlUkcCDl5VwBRdG1v7qRFId0B5LderNxdl
 qkqbr5iLgDpRt0E9i/NRSKxOts6c//X/0Rllsn4f4y+wdc/lFNf1wzl9AGjarubH6VwL
 ET/yJyj564XBlPxvVcguA8o2xVD9aJKj3mmtEf4HsmUHneKArmGYw2IjC/Ek4DjFxwlk
 mR17w4zTFDjbo4WQVrX0pHvxNVNmNXQJOfBlnt19Wc6FD5JUnWb1/sRyAmAZJo8I0njo
 OGbWoO5hrwdmIZlWQuoUG5f+3RpXvTwp2NN8f2V4//6AV+MPv1VJr2kSYBsBCl17jCuV
 ge1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=fZtqbZkZgrEr++OeUHRREcCANRtJR3EwDppMZ+S75tA=;
 b=SUznwpE9kz36jTVq3+eBzFj80uvZ10FM398xQeRCDOgTfGUny5Ucz/CG1npTptTFiP
 Zxynf1ZbAVJLMSgZ1K5/hVjujL6DDF1WBd5EmkzDaZDkk1S1oo6hA8kLXsOoL+iql6h7
 LTYi0GNtuan5gIG9IEotdAoYov6a/2ju5/Rix0t83tGU5qJVlGzvZhYLqnq08Dt51LrM
 p6X5MUBGB9EIBdpNEOL/p4RhVfk9Gtr+LSXMlml/KZpLEItvG059PMaRx1M2sircbwBd
 xdaI1+13zWJ8pZNArKuixF2766Y4LlRMRzt3B9VhxFsVeVN/0GXGYfo3g3D3a4ehUxQs
 weWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJXjbNjnLsD9KdTgmbyV8WfG+nbJBOo8ci+S42kpLajyBwb9IsyWJOB9P5ClTBWRb3HbVfXnejWtfKaHA==
X-Received: by 10.159.37.35 with SMTP id 32mr8859331uaz.53.1467776249772; Tue,
 05 Jul 2016 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.4.165 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: wei wang <lnykww@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:37:29 +0800
Message-ID: <CAPM6dUAUcFNQ5N0KOShM5_GSRf5m_NXVvPsqF2nWL2GFTmgBvQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [dpdk-users]  performance issue
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 03:37:30 -0000

Hi,all.

I am using single queue of the x520 nic.  when sending at the rate of
4500 packets in 3ms, rte_eth_tx_burst begins to drop packet. The size
of each packet is 1k .  I doubt that there may exist some relationship
between nic performance and number of queues?