From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f45.google.com (mail-pg0-f45.google.com [74.125.83.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDF73250 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 18:14:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id q125so59311221pgq.2 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 09:14:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudsimple-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=Ytht3NocWj9xcZpKHyIHtrtEKaf4p59x6NYFxV6tl9c=; b=B2+/n2Fk7SMI4B7c85k34yZdCx3v6m9j8V9cJLRer8pjf9IsUUSL/u8XqCrXzRcbgN 0ApF8+3UFEmLuWMsQyLlVXuoqxAOYB75UO6RUo/E9fqbiliFtinIEgiVu/uSZFLgIjpJ TEjuIUhJraFpyAzhFnwrq/ZiBVyOK7wd/yBrW9dCMtlhIj/ISP107jAQzlB12oUAN1xi zXZvqWM8gX8DfcbWj6FkdgYp4jKSSKEPyGuZ1xx5ZKmrfO151K9yBRCT8G37DYhBDivP tXXwJ/ny8u5nzUFtL4bPBOtr8CAzu9Xz6g9e1Wie5MsUM5I7k5U3MhQRTobiThZn7hgU LXRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=Ytht3NocWj9xcZpKHyIHtrtEKaf4p59x6NYFxV6tl9c=; b=Czg6Q1YaRSWAlUSAp+u+FrCtsvo2YYxvf1yspasvNYSuwlE8EBecd9fjM1HGufMyVl BL404vkhrf68jqX2oDKhmBk2KylEywXHZ/3QsC62RXI7Sk68tvo24p/3REuZwV4+KMAJ B4zN9gb/bu6TOF4KcD3yNCk1JxRiDSmkcO6Bhov5MskhoctPK1gaJc/eToaI1nVGnOT+ f6jilZdToxQiGH5ugLx1pN0B/UN6rql7BKbWhuBMSyJjzVbFpv93wquszJopuvc4NFfH 6HpVsD5yHtG9zHzs8widKzF+vCN7IwQQdYrrhl8xQxFUyj/yGrzdzhgv3x7g7hZPaxWg AHpw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCxTmtj0PKTSzpFsabVAYboGEkA730xaNvZbNmyMfYdvmG1DnRA 2JGAUt1owE3/suCT17KwGqBTJmV0It4vcdbBhWK6OFyQFj8k2Q2qIpcTnoNqGudeb2nHeliQoyq 4uBmgGuZY7kJrPVc0QcoP8RY7SfThR4LyBSZg7oPpl3Bn6dNBtw== X-Received: by 10.99.97.68 with SMTP id v65mr13068430pgb.76.1494951289778; Tue, 16 May 2017 09:14:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.19] ([106.51.65.217]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w85sm26107587pfk.62.2017.05.16.09.14.48 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 May 2017 09:14:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 21:44:46 +0530 To: users@dpdk.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) Subject: [dpdk-users] Memory Allocation X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 16:14:51 -0000 Hi All, When I have a system with NUMA enabled and say my application is running = one DPDK thread and I use that thread for the memory allocation will the = memory be physically allocated during the access time or will the memory = be allocated on the Node where the DPDK thread was initially running = when the memory allocation functions was called. So threads accessing = the memory locations from the other nodes remotely will suffer a = degradation in performance. Please correct me if I am wrong.=20 Thanking You, Param.