From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC5E2B84 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:54:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2436; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1491951245; x=1493160845; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=tKk4W1ekUfCKT3Htyt7lgW62a3b1epysqsUcGtYZOFE=; b=K/TPaVVks9IwmArDyRHU2sIvs4K2pxWhPjPT2fzW0Q2rBPSShfKoL9To s5TDtv0z82+GLaw8VHIMu5NKynYeY+IMXQ+oU0HX7tG07mwPl3BB7LzxF Jg7zpOrhvKW7vYb5Myqap5XcugDlUvaW+nWDqXJCKq3W45EhFaM5AbiXT o=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DDAQDpXe1Y/5hdJa1cHAEBBAEBCgEBg?= =?us-ascii?q?m46K4FzjXKhdIU0gg+KCj8YAQIBAQEBAQEBax0LhicBDAFzJwSKI5keki6KeQE?= =?us-ascii?q?LASWGUIRwgSSJFwWcfwGBVJEJkURwkxABHzg+R1sVhxuJFYENAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,187,1488844800"; d="scan'208,217";a="409079378" Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Apr 2017 22:54:04 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3BMs4tg019618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:54:04 GMT Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:54:03 -0500 Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:54:03 -0500 From: "Neeraj Tandon (netandon)" To: "users@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: Request for information Thread-Index: AQHSsxaEYuCRlAd70E2cw1TA15wOOA== Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:54:03 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.5.160527 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.155.152.17] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-users] Request for information X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:54:06 -0000 Hi, I have just started tinkering with DPDK. A request for pointers if follow= ing is currently feasible : 1. I have at present Centos Host with 3.10 Kernel running with DPDK comp= atible NIC and 2 MB huge pages 2. I install an Open Vswitch and use one of the ports in the bridge as = DPDK ports 3. Now if I have an application in a docker container which need to sen= d and receive packets using these DPDK ports. I know Open Vswitch supports DPDK but how can I configure 1. open Vswitch with these DPDK port to be used by docker containers 2. And Docker container to use these DPDK compatible interfaces. Is it possible at all to accomplish this configuration. Any pointers to d= o that ? Regards, Neeraj