DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dorsett, Michal" <Michal.Dorsett@verint.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>,
	"Maimon, Royi" <Royi.Maimon@verint.com>,
	"Heijmans, Merav" <Merav.Heijmans@verint.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Round-robin instead of RSS
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 06:43:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DAC43FCF19B05149A1D1F5E9005F94F8013590954E@TLVMBX1.verint.corp.verintsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171205143431.79d47d61@xeon-e3>

I think my wording was not clear enough:

Every packet that enters through the device will be delayed by our application for 1 second.
Given 10Gbps worth of traffic, for example, at an average packet size of 600 bytes, this is roughly 2M packets per second.

A 710-series NIC makes use of 1M mbufs in a queue at the very most. In order for us to delay 2M packets, we need to create several queues per NIC.
I understand RSS is in the hardware, but hardware can be programmed, too, and hopefully turned off - and that's my question - whether, in addition to the RSS there is a round-robin policy that can be configured.

Thanks,

Michal

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 12:35 AM
To: Dorsett, Michal <Michal.Dorsett@verint.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org; Maimon, Royi <Royi.Maimon@verint.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Round-robin instead of RSS

On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:23:23 +0000
"Dorsett, Michal" <Michal.Dorsett@verint.com> wrote:

> We are using an XL710 nic 4x10Gbps.
> Our application needs to delay all packets in the system for at least the first second, and depending on the type of traffic mbufs may need to delay packets even more.
>
> Since the XL710 makes use of, at most, 1M mbufs in a queue and not more - we need to create several queues that provide enough mbufs for the nic not to starve.
>
> Because we handle extremely varied traffic, we may not be able to statically configure an RSS to load balance traffic evenly between the queues.
>
> Is it possible to set up a round-robin policy between the queues instead of RSS?
> I realize the drawbacks - un-orderliness, etc. - but please assume we have our methods of handling those specific issues.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michal Dorsett
> Developer, Strategic IP Group
> Desk: +972 962 4350
> Mobile: +972 50 771 6689
> Verint Cyber Intelligence
> www.verint.com<http://www.verint.com/>

I don't work for Intel team and don't have XL710. But although XL710 may have limited hardware queue depth, there is no requirement that you give all the mbuf's directly to XL710 at once. If you have to hold off traffic, then just don't pass it to the device.

RSS is built in the hardware.


This electronic message may contain proprietary and confidential information of Verint Systems Inc., its affiliates and/or subsidiaries. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive this e-mail for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone this message or any information contained in this message. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us by replying to this e-mail.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-06  6:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-05 21:23 Dorsett, Michal
2017-12-05 22:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-06  6:43   ` Dorsett, Michal [this message]
2017-12-06 23:05     ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-07  7:43       ` Dorsett, Michal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DAC43FCF19B05149A1D1F5E9005F94F8013590954E@TLVMBX1.verint.corp.verintsystems.com \
    --to=michal.dorsett@verint.com \
    --cc=Merav.Heijmans@verint.com \
    --cc=Royi.Maimon@verint.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).