From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com (mail-pg0-f67.google.com [74.125.83.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF71F3B5; Mon, 8 May 2017 07:31:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg0-f67.google.com with SMTP id s62so9048711pgc.0; Sun, 07 May 2017 22:31:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=GCcla8Exq6ZuEoIN84y8BWa4dOXGTkrbbwrBd2HNg2E=; b=KbF5mg3aIjUh+S17lsa4nb/gGMDP1x327JPbzfr3EfpYKl2Ax7VthAIz8roJnKlHU6 VxpW19lEu6pDpZ++C6F8ceSGwb3LVuWmffudbxLK6TvtI2fg292cEj9rBGAWSXfAGPk2 0v9IsfkFsOCXZuNvl7S49Cp3QzL86l3eoOUvgKDYsTXLftvbMNHRPPiKD5jbtS+IhLg/ I/szN9cv5fh+qPm4/8AJfmfXHZh5ULkTknedBdfZ6m8WFp06XYFXsJkMXs1jYjyfYTeZ iC29yjW8FncyASQbySwZYSasRZbMcHPuzNfV0zsV9ekMAzjs/LYG/rUm9dD6xgGIdd7R 5bQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=GCcla8Exq6ZuEoIN84y8BWa4dOXGTkrbbwrBd2HNg2E=; b=sQDXzIGDpGCPES29Zpin0HmJWkA1CJsfqJfqzHXdr8GndSzxUAWE8YZ7Qw1fj5oUfT LhvprQ8BEvrO7toq5Tizj0LBA8qv/q9xdQXmzlEo60prp2uduhzmwyLxi60uL4YaVosa 8yJDBHRT3suysH92tsA0MUoFXczyTcstQKaGsmWFMGQWJ+MMr6StWbppnAWRXNq0NnWr D2jRnvWbpw/4dMFJvoF4WSHZNktceni0GBU2PSZJjJmbj+YLxdy7Vm9YfFU6MaPjnsPm zbtzb1kODz4ypVwR/ICtAxVW4KcNhtrZa1CZglArMZ1T7NEwegS0z3CADpH5cFSPEU6t 3dtg== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7KduJe4DNg7r9rIffMVL784kiv4A2WmuUtiwap8MlHzfjO4/I1 dt3td4NoNHWMQw== X-Received: by 10.84.238.206 with SMTP id l14mr61440842pln.189.1494221497859; Sun, 07 May 2017 22:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [166.111.132.213] ([166.111.132.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e4sm16642165pfe.96.2017.05.07.22.31.35 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 07 May 2017 22:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) From: zhilong zheng In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 13:31:32 +0800 Cc: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org Message-Id: References: To: Nidhia Varghese X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Sharing tables among pipelines X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 05:31:39 -0000 Hi Nidia, I have tried something similar to yours. Actually, I share some hash = tables among different/independent processes. For my application, I extend the codebase from DPDK Sample Applications = 23.1.4(http://dpdk.org/doc/guides-16.07/sample_app_ug/multi_process.html = = Client-Server Multi-process Example). The API "rte_memzone_lookup(const = char *name)" contributes to the availability. I hope this will help you. Regards, Zhilong > =D4=DA 2017=C4=EA5=D4=C28=C8=D5=A3=AC12:54=A3=ACNidhia Varghese = =D0=B4=B5=C0=A3=BA >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Any comments on this question? >=20 > Thanks, > Nidhia >=20 > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Nidhia Varghese > Date: Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:43 PM > Subject: Sharing tables among pipelines > To: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org >=20 >=20 > Hi, >=20 > For my pipeline application, I want to share same table between two > different pipeline. Is that possible? If yes, how can I do it? >=20 > Thanks for your reply and help. >=20 > --=20 >=20 > Regards, > Nidhia Varghese >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 >=20 > Regards, > Nidhia Varghese