From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E26316B; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:18:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2017 08:18:15 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,198,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="68252112" Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.153]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2017 08:18:14 -0800 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.173]) by IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:18:13 +0000 From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" To: Thomas Monjalon , "Trahe, Fiona" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , Pankaj Joshi , "users@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Problem running dpdk-qat example in SR-IOV mode Thread-Index: AQHSi3rQia9G+bsCR0aJ9fPw6GX+SqF2yZ9Q Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:18:13 +0000 Message-ID: References: <348A99DA5F5B7549AA880327E580B4358918EF1F@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <5068483.Xs10W06zQs@xps13> In-Reply-To: <5068483.Xs10W06zQs@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNWExNjdlNGMtZWU2ZC00ZTI0LWFjMDMtOTRjMTViOGM3OWM2IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IkRYQ1QxY2JBMHdIUjRcLzBUNmJwXC9PRDArSjhHTHdvcnEwQm8zSDc1aFFBVT0ifQ== x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Problem running dpdk-qat example in SR-IOV mode X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:18:17 -0000 Hi Thomas, > -----Original Message----- > From: users [mailto:users-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas > Monjalon > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 1:11 PM > To: Trahe, Fiona > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Pankaj Joshi; users@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Problem running dpdk-qat example in > SR-IOV mode >=20 > 2017-02-20 11:53, Trahe, Fiona: > > From: Pankaj Joshi > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I am trying to run dpdk-qat example code in SR-IOV mode. Steps done > by me > > > so far are : > > > > The dpdk-qat example app is an earlier mechanism of wrapping a QAT > driver into DPDK - it's not using the cryptodev API, and depends on both = a > kernel driver and user-space libs from a QAT package. > > Unless you have a really good reason for using this (like you wanted to > use the older Cave Creek device) I would recommend you use the cryptodev > API. >=20 > Could we remove this obsolete example? This is a good point. How can we proceed with this? As it is a sample appli= cation, does it require a deprecation notice? Thanks, Pablo