From: "Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <matias.elo@nokia.com>
To: "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-users] Calling rte_event_port_unlink() causes subsequent events to end up in wrong port
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 12:05:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F3138419-AB07-485C-9BB3-C217C63DADB8@nokia.com> (raw)
Hi,
I'm seeing some unexpected(?) behavior after calling rte_event_port_unlink()
with the SW eventdev driver (DPDK 17.11.2/18.02.1, RTE_EVENT_MAX_QUEUES_PER_DEV=255).
Scenario:
- Run SW evendev on a service core
- Start eventdev with e.g. 16 ports. Each core will have a dedicated port.
- Create 1 atomic queue and link all active ports to it (some ports may not
be linked).
- Allocate N events and enqueue them to eventdev
- Next, each worker core does a number of scheduling rounds concurrently.
E.g.
uint64_t rx_events = 0;
while(rx_events < SCHED_ROUNDS) {
num_deq = rte_event_dequeue_burst(dev_id, port_id, ev, 1, 0);
if (num_deq) {
rx_events++;
rte_event_enqueue_burst(dev_id, port_id, ev, 1);
}
}
- This works fine but problems occur when doing cleanup after the first
loop finishes on some core.
E.g.
rte_event_port_unlink(dev_id, port_id, NULL, 0);
while(1) {
num_deq = rte_event_dequeue_burst(dev_id, port_id, ev, 1, 0);
if (num_deq == 0)
break;
rte_event_enqueue_burst(dev_id, port_id, ev, 1);
}
- The events enqueued in the cleanup loop will ramdomly end up either back to
the same port (which has already been unlinked) or to port 0, which is not
used (mapping rte_lcore_id to port_id).
As far as I understand the eventdev API, an eventdev port shouldn't have to be
linked to the target queue for enqueue to work. Have I understoop something
incorrectly or is there a bug in the SW scheduler?
I can provide a simple test application for reproducing this issue. Below is an
example rte_event_dev_dump() output when processing events with two cores
(ports 2 and 3). The rest of the ports are not linked at all but somehow an event
ends up to port 0 stalling the system.
Regards,
Matias
EventDev todo-fix-name: ports 16, qids 1
rx 908342
drop 0
tx 908342
sched calls: 42577156
sched cq/qid call: 43120490
sched no IQ enq: 42122057
sched no CQ enq: 42122064
inflight 32, credits: 4064
Port 0
rx 0 drop 0 tx 2 inflight 2
Max New: 1024 Avg cycles PP: 0 Credits: 0
Receive burst distribution:
0:-nan%
rx ring used: 0 free: 4096
cq ring used: 2 free: 14
Port 1
rx 0 drop 0 tx 0 inflight 0
Max New: 1024 Avg cycles PP: 0 Credits: 0
Receive burst distribution:
0:-nan%
rx ring used: 0 free: 4096
cq ring used: 0 free: 16
Port 2
rx 524292 drop 0 tx 524290 inflight 0
Max New: 1024 Avg cycles PP: 190 Credits: 30
Receive burst distribution:
0:98% 1-4:1.82%
rx ring used: 0 free: 4096
cq ring used: 0 free: 16
Port 3
rx 384050 drop 0 tx 384050 inflight 0
Max New: 1024 Avg cycles PP: 191 Credits: 0
Receive burst distribution:
0:100% 1-4:0.04%
rx ring used: 0 free: 4096
cq ring used: 0 free: 16
...
Port 15
rx 0 drop 0 tx 0 inflight 0
Max New: 1024 Avg cycles PP: 0 Credits: 0
Receive burst distribution:
0:-nan%
rx ring used: 0 free: 4096
cq ring used: 0 free: 16
Queue 0 (Atomic)
rx 908342 drop 0 tx 908342
Per Port Stats:
Port 0: Pkts: 2 Flows: 1
Port 1: Pkts: 0 Flows: 0
Port 2: Pkts: 524290 Flows: 0
Port 3: Pkts: 384050 Flows: 0
Port 4: Pkts: 0 Flows: 0
Port 5: Pkts: 0 Flows: 0
Port 6: Pkts: 0 Flows: 0
Port 7: Pkts: 0 Flows: 0
Port 8: Pkts: 0 Flows: 0
Port 9: Pkts: 0 Flows: 0
Port 10: Pkts: 0 Flows: 0
Port 11: Pkts: 0 Flows: 0
Port 12: Pkts: 0 Flows: 0
Port 13: Pkts: 0 Flows: 0
Port 14: Pkts: 0 Flows: 0
Port 15: Pkts: 0 Flows: 0
-- iqs empty --
reply other threads:[~2018-05-29 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F3138419-AB07-485C-9BB3-C217C63DADB8@nokia.com \
--to=matias.elo@nokia.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).